Product design and development

By L. Krstulović-Opara, Ž. Domazet. 2009

6,597 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f1c0f4db078ebcf4fc9bbdb4540cc9a07c864784

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship (2017, positive): “…extent this has been informed by existing theories on product life cycle (Utterback, 1994), architectural innovation (Henderson & Clark, 1990), product development process (Ulrich & Eppinger, 2011), etc., all of which assume relatively stable and well-deﬁned boundaries around a product/service.”
The evolution of production systems from Industry 2.0 through Industry 4.0 (2018, background): “Product architecture can be defined as the way in which the functional elements of a product are allocated to physical components and the way in which these components interact (Ulrich and Eppinger 2008).”
Identifying Customer Needs from User-Generated Content (2019, background): “In product development, firms analyze customer needs to identify new product opportunities (Herrmann et al., 2000), to design new products (Ulrich and Eppinger 2004, Sullivan 1986) and to improve existing products and services (Matzler and Hinterhuber, 1998).”
Automated Marketing Research Using Online Customer Reviews (2011, neutral): “In product design, a product architecture defines the hierarchical decomposition of a product into components (Ulrich and Eppinger 2003).”
How is innovation in aquaculture conceptualized and managed? A systematic literature review and reflection framework to inform analysis and action (2017, methodology): “The first type of business andmanagerial approach,New Product Development (NPD), refers to processes through which new products are conceived, specified, developed, tested, and brought to market, and where users are consulted during the process (Montagna, 2011; Ulrich and Eppinger, 2004).”
The Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix (2012, methodology): “In design work, modeling can involve building a physical prototype – “an approximation of the product along one or more dimensions of interest” (Ulrich & Eppinger, 1995, p. 219) – using easy-to-fabricate modeling materials, like cardboard and duct tape, or easy-to-assemble structural elements, like…”
QUANTITATIVE MEASURES FOR DESIGN BY ANALOGY (2000, methodology): “Design philosophies such as this have been proven valid and effective in the literature (Pahl and Beitz, 1996; Ullman, 1997; Ulrich and Eppinger, 1995; Hubka and Eder, 1988).”
Managing technological change in the digital age: the role of architectural frames (2014, methodology): “Concurring with leading technology and innovation management research (von Hippel, 1990; Schilling, 2000; Ulrich and Eppinger, 2003; Langlois, 2006; Murmann and Frenken, 2006; Baldwin, 2008), we have introduced the notion of architectural frames to address limitations to manage technological change…”
Toward a Product System Modularity Construct: Literature Review and Reconceptualization (2007, background): “It is a strategy for organizing complex products and processes efficiently.” The same notion of module as a “chunk” of the product present in [ 140 ] conveys the idea of the module as a part of the product with at least a minimum level of complexity.”
Institutional Work as Logics Shift: The Case of Intel’s Transformation to Platform Leader (2013, background): “See Ulrich (1995) and Ulrich and Eppinger (1995).”