Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement
By G. Elwyn, A. Edwards, M. Wensing, K. Hood, Christine Atwell, R. Grol. 2003
550 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
Citations in the corpus
- Ethical Implementation of Artificial Intelligence to Select Embryos in In Vitro Fertilization (2021, methodology): “Existing measures of shared decision-making and decision quality, such as the Decision Conflict Scale [37], the OPTION Scale [38], and the SURE Test [39] (among other patient-reported measures) can be used to guide such an evaluation.”
- An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. (2006, background): “At least one of these elements is discussed in nearly all of the articles with conceptual definitions of SDM [1–8,10– 19,21,23,24,26–28,38–49,51–56,58,59,61,62,64–69,72,74, 76–78,81–86,88,90–97,101,102,105–108,110,113–117,120, 121,123,124,126–131,133–135,139,141,142,144–146,148– 150,152–160,162–165,”
- Shared decision making: Concepts, evidence, and practice. (2015, unknown): “Most studies so far that provide an indication of the prevalence of SDM have used the OPTION scale [29,30].”
- Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. (2018, methodology): “Effect of interventions on primary outcome: interventions targeting both patients and healthcare professionals compared to usual care (Continued) Hess 2012 Patientmediated intervention + educational meeting Usual care OPTION 200 2.83 (2.43 to 3.21) x Coylewright 2016 Patientmediated intervention + E”
- Handbook of Health Psychology (2001, unknown): “The Observing Patient Involvement in Decision Making (OPTION) instrument is the most frequently used for measuring patient involvement from an observer’s viewpoint (Elwyn et al., 2003).”