An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters.
By G. Makoul, M. Clayman. Patient Education and Counseling, 2006
1,551 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1550ee5cab4fe441f12f745354caa47e91c98118
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice (2012, background): “The principles of SDM are well documented and the common elements have been summarized.(5) The earliest mention was in 1982,(6) but the idea draws on and deepens the principles of patient centered care.”
- Shared decision making: Concepts, evidence, and practice. (2015, methodology): “Only the elements options and patient preferences appeared in more than half of the definitions [7].”
- Health Literacy and Adherence to Medical Treatment in Chronic and Acute Illness: A Meta-Analysis (2016, background): “Thus, when patients are adequately informed and understand clearly what they are asked to do, they are better able to share in the decisions that affect their health, and are thus more adherent to regimens that they had a part in choosing [3, 12].”
- Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. (2018, background): “A systematic review of SDM as a concept identified 161 definitions and summarized the key elements into one integrative model of SDM in medical encounters (Makoul 2006).”
- Where Is the Evidence? A Systematic Review of Shared Decision Making and Patient Outcomes (2015, background): “The Cochrane review’s finding that there were no differences in patient self-reports of SDM by group assignment among decision aid studies that included an empirical measure of SDM highlights the uncertainty of what led to the changes in patient outcomes.(19) Our review identified only 9 studies con”