Wide-Field-of-View Atom Probe Reconstruction

By B. Geiser, David J. Larson, E. Oltman, S. Gerstl, D. Reinhard, T. Kelly, T. Prosa. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 2009

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Surfaces, Coatings and Films

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f175b80aa49bd5884022c68318b3ee473073c32f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. F. Geuser
2. Alexis Deschamps
3. Baptiste Gault
4. J. Cairney
5. V. Araullo-Peters
6. T. Prosa
7. R. Kolli
8. David J. Larson

In Computational Mechanics

1. F. Geuser
2. David J. Larson
3. Baptiste Gault

Citations in the corpus

• Microstructural evolution during ageing of Al–Cu–Li–x alloys (2014, methodology): “Data reconstruction, using standard reconstruction algorithms [27], and 3D visualisation was carried out using the commercial software IVAS (Cameca).”
• Three-dimensional nanoscale characterisation of materials by atom probe tomography (2018, background): “simple model with a limited number of parameters that has evolved to accommodate increasing instrument field-of-view [84,85].”
• Atom probe tomography spatial reconstruction: Status and directions (2013, methodology): “- either a magnification factor is estimated, allowing for conversion of (X,Y) to (x,y) positions [25], or the spatial coordinates (x,y,z) are defined as the intersection between the proposed ion emission surface and the straight line joining P and the detector hit position [27, 28]; - for each ion ”