Atom probe tomography spatial reconstruction: Status and directions
By David J. Larson, Baptiste Gault, B. Geiser, F. Geuser, F. Vurpillot. 2013
144 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract In this review we present an overview of the current atom probe tomography spatial data reconstruction paradigm, and explore some potential routes to improve the current methodology in order to yield a more accurate representation of nanoscale microstructure. Many of these potential improvement methods are directly tied to extensive application of advanced numerical methods, which are also very briefly reviewed. We have described effects resulting from the application of the standard model and then introduced several potential improvements, first in the far field, and, second, in the near field. The issues encountered in both cases are quite different but ultimately they combine to determine the spatial resolution of the technique.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Metals and Alloys
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9d524cf42ee05019150f47f0f34c1f331d7cba43
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
In Materials Chemistry
In Metals and Alloys
Citations in the corpus
- Local Electrode Atom Probe Tomography: A User's Guide (2013, unknown): “Using a previously described method [24, 26, 62, 63] we have simulated the cases of a high-field precipitate in a low-field matrix (matrix evaporation field is half that of the precipitate evaporation field) as well as the case of a low-field precipitate in a high-field matrix (matrix field is 15 % ”
- Three-dimensional nanoscale characterisation of materials by atom probe tomography (2018, background): “ation process of specimens in APT as well as the reconstruction process [90,263].”