Late-Night Comedy in Election 2000: Its Influence on Candidate Trait Ratings and the Moderating Effects of Political Knowledge and Partisanship

By Dannagal Goldthwaite Young. 2004

229 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f109ae258837c2d4a1ea77486f20819b1e3d50fc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Literature and Literary Theory

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Primacy Effects of The Daily Show and National TV News Viewing: Young Viewers, Political Gratifications, and Internal Political Self-Efficacy (2007, background): “In addition to attracting the youth demographic, the 2004 National Annenberg Election Survey revealed The Daily Show audience to be well educated and highly knowledgeable about politics in general (Young, 2004a).”
The Effect of Television Viewing on Adolescents' Civic Participation: Political Efficacy as a Mediating Mechanism (2009, background): “In another study, Young (2004) found that late-night comedy viewing did not have a main effect on attitudes, but the impact of these ratings varied by level of political knowledge.”
The Privileged Role of the Late-Night Joke: Exploring Humor's Role in Disrupting Argument Scrutiny (2008, background): “Although recent research has pointed to effects of late-night comedy viewing on political attitudes and cognitions (Moy, Xenos, & Hess, 2003; Young, 2004, 2006), scant attention has been paid to the development of a theoretical model to account for these outcomes.”
The Affect Effect of Political Satire: Sarcastic Humor, Negative Emotions, and Political Participation (2014, background): “Meanwhile, numerous studies indicate that the tone of political humor is predominantly aggressive and unflattering toward politics as it frequently emphasizes and assails ostensible failures of political processes and wrongdoings of public figures (Moy & Pfau, 2000; Young, 2004).”
Predicting the Consumption of Political TV Satire: Affinity for Political Humor, The Daily Show, and The Colbert Report (2011, background): “’’ We wanted to include a wide range of news exposure variables given that Young and Tisinger’s (2006) analysis revealed that consumers of various types of political entertainment TV also consumed different types of traditional news outlets.”
Fact-Checking Effectiveness as a Function of Format and Tone: Evaluating FactCheck.org and FlackCheck.org (2018, background): “2009; Young, 2004).”
All Joking Aside: A Serious Investigation into the Persuasive Effect of Funny Social Issue Messages (2007, background): “…effects of such routines are of increasing scholarly interest (e.g., Hollander, 2005; Moy, Xenos, & Hess, 2006; Niven, Lichter, & Amundson, 2003; Young, 2004) If, as some have suggested, humor attracts attention but distracts from relevant message content, then studying the persuasive effects…”
Satire, Punch Lines, and the Nightly News: Untangling Media Effects on Political Participation (2011, background): “In traditional late-night comedy, the jokes tend to be focused on the personal traits of public officials, and are remarkably consistent with each other (Niven et al., 2003; Young, 2004).”
Candidate Appearances on Soft News Shows and Public Knowledge About Primary Campaigns (2006, unknown): “2005) studies, this study draws on Downs (1957) and Popkin (1994) to argue that”