Fact-Checking Effectiveness as a Function of Format and Tone: Evaluating FactCheck.org and FlackCheck.org
By Dannagal Goldthwaite Young, Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Shannon Poulsen, A. Goldring. 2018
158 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/98f81a363f0ae330207ed54e352276106500e078
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- Elmie Nekmat
- Emily K. Vraga
- Leticia Bode
- R. Lance Holbert
- M. Tully
- Jonathan Cohen
- Nathan Walter
- Keren Eyal
In Sociology and Political Science
- Elmie Nekmat
- Emily K. Vraga
- Leticia Bode
- Nathan Walter
- R. Lance Holbert
- M. Tully
- Jonathan Cohen
- Scott E. Caplan
Citations in the corpus
- Nudge Effect of Fact-Check Alerts: Source Influence and Media Skepticism on Sharing of News Misinformation in Social Media (2020, methodology): “While recent studies have evaluated the effectiveness of fact-check formats to correct audiences’ beliefs and misperceptions (Young et al., 2018) and motivate users to create and disseminate factcheck alerts (Amazeen et al.”
- Fact-Checking: A Meta-Analysis of What Works and for Whom (2019, background): “, counter-argue) fact-checking more than their less knowledgeable counterparts (Young et al., 2018) and thus be less likely to accept corrections of misinformation.”
- Creating News Literacy Messages to Enhance Expert Corrections of Misinformation on Twitter (2020, background): “…journalistic outlets, serve as effective agents to correct misinformation, although success can depend on features of the correction, including use of humor or visual stimuli (Amazeen et al., 2018; Garrett et al., 2013; Nyhan & Reifler, 2010; Thorson, 2016; Wood & Porter, 2019; Young et al., 2018).”