The influence of psychosocial and environmental factors on children's independent mobility and relationship to peer frequentation
By Miretta Prezza, S. Pilloni, C. Morabito, Cinzia Sersante, Francesca Romana Alparone, Maria Vittoria Giuliani. 2001
312 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f0f072744f50625e6e72417c2f82e21fd13b819a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
- Marketta Kyttä
- Francesca Romana Alparone
- Maria Giuseppina Pacilli
- Billie Giles-Corti
- Raktim Mitra
- Miretta Prezza
In Sociology and Political Science
- Maria Giuseppina Pacilli
- Francesca Romana Alparone
- Marketta Kyttä
- Billie Giles-Corti
- Maria Kamargianni
- G. McCormack
- C. Thompson
- Ellen Beate Hansen Sandseter
Citations in the corpus
- Where Do Children Travel to and What Local Opportunities Are Available? The Relationship Between Neighborhood Destinations and Children’s Independent Mobility (2013, background): “…associated with IM include age, proximity to destinations, support from peers, parents’ attitude toward IM, and parent and child fears about traffic, crime, and strangers, with some gender differences observed (Hillman, 1994; Jones, Davis, & Eyers, 2000; Kyttä, 1997; Prezza et al., 2001).”
- Independent Mobility and Mode Choice for School Transportation: A Review and Framework for Future Research (2013, background): “These developments influence school travel behaviour; research has demonstrated that children who are considered more “mature” are more likely to be allowed to walk or cycle on their own (Johansson, 2006; Prezza et al., 2001; Wen et al., 2008).”
- Does the walkability of neighbourhoods affect children's independent mobility, independent of parental, socio-cultural and individual factors? (2014, background): “capable of handling the environment) (Prezza et al. 2001).”
- On children's independent mobility: the interplay of demographic, environmental, and psychosocial factors (2012, methodology): “Regarding the choice not to involve children in our investigation, it is worth noting that several studies on the independent mobility of children have used only parents’ responses (Hüttenmoser 1995, Prezza et al. 2001, Johansson 2006, Fyhri and Hjorthol 2009).”
- The extent of children's independent mobility and the number of actualized affordances as criteria for child-friendly environments (2004, methodology): “Prezza et al. (2001) found that the most independent children living in Rome, were those who lived in apartment buildings with courtyards, near the parks, and in new neighborhoods.”
- Parental perception of social risk and of positive potentiality of outdoor autonomy for children: The development of two instruments (2005, background): “The importance of being integrated in the neighbourhood was confirmed by Hüttenmoser (1995) and Prezza et al. (2001).”
- Affordances and Independent Mobility in the Assessment of Environmental Child Friendliness (2003, background): “In recent decades, children’s independent mobility regarding their own environments have become increasingly declined, especially in Western countries, Finland being one exception (Article II; Hillman et al., 1990; O’Brien et al., 2000; Tranter, 1993; Prezza et al., 2001; Gaster, 1992).”
- Hybrid Choice Model to Investigate Effects of Teenagers' Attitudes toward Walking and Cycling on Mode Choice Behavior (2013, background): “Among the demographic variables, a child’s age (21, 22) and gender (13, 19, 23, 24) have been found to influence children’s choice of school travel mode significantly.”