University research funding and publication performance--An international comparison

By Otto Auranen, Mika P. Nieminen. 2010

472 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Statistics and Probability, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f0c16f10544e7d8d9fbe30936d30329d78f7256b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Peter James Bentley
2. Svein Kyvik
3. Magnus Gulbrandsen
4. Steven R. Williams
5. Keith R. Leatham

In Statistics and Probability

1. Maja Zaman Groff
2. Vlado Dimovski
3. Svein Kyvik
4. Simon Cadez
5. Steven R. Williams
6. Keith R. Leatham

In Strategy and Management

1. Maja Zaman Groff
2. Vlado Dimovski
3. Svein Kyvik
4. Simon Cadez
5. Steven R. Williams
6. Keith R. Leatham
7. M. Oehrtman

Citations in the corpus

• Journal Quality in Mathematics Education (2017, methodology): “Journal rankings are used by many governments as a measure of research output and quality (Auranen & Nieminen, 2010) and are factored into decisions about resource allocation (Oswald, 2007).”
• The relationship between basic and applied research in universities (2015, background): “Government core funding of research has declined in a range of OECD countries, and the mechanisms for disbursing public funds have shifted from stable block grants towards results-based models (Auranen and Nieminen 2010).”
• Research, teaching and performance evaluation in academia: the salience of quality (2017, background): “Third, the use of a single database reduced the subjectivity concerned with the assessment of an individual’s research output (Auranen and Nieminen 2010).”
• Industry Funding of University Research and Scientific Productivity (2011, unknown): “Public grants increased likewise which confirms Auranen and Nieminen (2010), who report a development towards a more competitive funding structure.”