The role of selective moral disengagement in terrorism and counterterrorism.

By A. Bandura. 2004

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f0a1a9f8dc5a6ee3a83cf15e76c3893a47c15b98

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. F. Moghaddam
2. A. Bandura
3. S. Owen
4. A. Mcalister
5. Nick Haslam
6. R. Bilali
7. Celia Moore
8. Linda Klebe Treviño

Citations in the corpus

• MECHANISMS OF MORAL DISENGAGEMENT IN SUPPORT OF MILITARY FORCE: THE IMPACT OF SEPT. 11 (2006, background): “self–sanctions disengaged by targeted nations to enable them to gain public support for military force, and to mount military campaigns that will necessarily inflict death and destruction (Bandura, 2004).”
• A Social Cognitive perspective on Positive Psychology (2011, background): “In path analysis of post-traumatic recovery, the contribution of an optimistic outlook is mediated through perceived coping self-efficacy (Benight & Bandura, 2004).”
• The staircase to terrorism: a psychological exploration. (2005, background): “…sufficient resources to persuade recruits to become disengaged from morality as it is defined by government authorities (and often by the majority in society) and morally engaged in the way morality is constructed by the terrorist organization (for a related discussion, see Bandura, 2004).”