The staircase to terrorism: a psychological exploration.
By F. Moghaddam. American Psychologist, 2005
904 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48f3552e17bcebb890e4b1f19c9a2c1fa362800f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Emma F. Thomas
- Creighton A. Mullins
- Heather J. Smith
- T. Pettigrew
- Winnifred R. Louis
- M. Hafez
- Silvana Bialosiewicz
- Craig McGarty
In Sociology and Political Science
- T. Pettigrew
- Emma F. Thomas
- Heather J. Smith
- Creighton A. Mullins
- Winnifred R. Louis
- M. Hafez
- Silvana Bialosiewicz
- Craig McGarty
Citations in the corpus
- Relative Deprivation (2012, background): “Researchers have invoked RD to explain phenomena ranging from poor physical health (Adler, Epel, Castellazzo, & Ickovics, 2000) to participation in collective protest (Newton, Mann, & Geary, 1980) and even to susceptibility to terrorist recruitment (Moghaddam, 2005).”
- Narrative and the Cultural Psychology of Identity (2008, background): “At a time in which threats to security are often framed in terms of identity (e.g., the individual “terrorist”; see Moghaddam, 2004), the empirical study of identity formation calls us to consider the rich complexity of individual lives and to refocus the dichotomous lens through which we are often…”
- Social interaction and psychological pathways to political engagement and extremism (2014, background): “Similarly, in the political violence literature, scholars have emphasized the incremental nature of engagement with violence, variously utilizing a staircase (Moghaddam, 2005) or conveyer-belt metaphor (Moskalenko & McCauley, 2009).”
- Protective Factors Against Extremism and Violent Radicalization: A Systematic Review of Research (2018, neutral): “Although various phases of radicalization have been proposed (e.g., Moghaddam, 2005; Silber & Bhatt, 2007), the respective processes that may begin with ideological interest and proceed over group affiliation to violent action are neither deterministic nor uniform (Borum, 2011; Jensen et al., 2016).”
- The Radicalization Puzzle: A Theoretical Synthesis of Empirical Approaches to Homegrown Extremism (2015, background): “Earlier studies that framed radicalization as a linear process that proceeds in stages were challenged empirically and analytically.(13) Subsequent works treated radicalization as an evolutionary, nonlinear phenomenon that emerges out of a convergence of several “predisposing risk factors” (Horgan);”
- Exposure to Extremist Online Content Could Lead to Violent Radicalization:A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence (2018, neutral): “…fromradicalizationresearchhighlightthevulnerabil-ityofadolescentstonarrativesthataddresspersonal identitycrises,theneedforgroupbelonging,andthe searchforapositivesocialidentity(e.g.,McCauley &Moskalenko,2009;Moghaddam,2005;Wik-torowicz,2004)–domainsthatarealsorelevant fordevelopmentalscientists.”