Smoothing Techniques: With Implementation in S
By Wolfgang Karl Härdle. 1991
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Elizabeth A. Becker
- Yoshua Bengio
- Sergey Levine
- Jay Barlow
- J. Urgen Schmidhuber
- Jan Peters
- Pieter Abbeel
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
Citations in the corpus
- Do Benefit Cuts Boost Job Findings? Swedish Evidence from the 1990s (2001, unknown): “For literature on nonparametric regressions, see Cleveland (1979), Cleveland, Devlin, and Grosse (1988), and Härdle (1990).”
- Are bid preferences benign? The effect of small business subsidies in highway procurement auctions (2007, background): “Estimation of the components of (14) and (15) must be performed separately for preference and non-preference auctions and for each combination of the number of small and large bidders,”
- Applications of Copulas to Analysis of Efficiency of Weather Derivatives as Primary Crop Insurance Instruments (2004, background): “where K(-) is a kernel function, and A is a degree of smoothness or bandwidth11 (Hardie, 1991).”
- Application of Bernstein Polynomials for smooth estimation of a distribution and density function (2002, background): “The reader is referred to the excellent texts by H? ardle (1991) and Silverman (1986) for smoothing techniques for curve estimation.”
- Mutual Information Analysis: a Comprehensive Study (2011, methodology): “In our case, we used the modified rule of thumb estimator [12, 27]:”
- Semi-parametric modelling in finance: theoretical foundations (2002, background): “Härdle (1990). It turns out that the tail decay of g is an indicator of the likelihood of extreme events and thus the whole density generator g is informative about risk and risk-management questions assuming that risk is measured by the portfolio VaR (which is coherent in the sense of Artzner et al”
- Bayesian density regression (2007, background): “The issues involved in choosing w(·) are related to those arising in choosing a kernel function in density estimation (Härdle, 1991), though the mechanics of how the function impacts the density estimator are very different.”
- Conditionally independent private information in OCS wildcat auctions (2000, methodology): “Speci"cally, we use h G "2.978]1.06p( a (n¸)~1@5 and h g "2.978]1.06p( a (n¸)~1@6, where p( a is the standard deviation of the logarithm of (1#bids), and the factor 2.978 follows from the use of the triweight kernel instead of the Gaussian kernel (see Hardle, 1991).”
- Asymmetry in first-price auctions with affiliated private values (2003, methodology): “The factor 2.978 follows from the use of the triweight kernel instead of the Gaussian kernel (see Hardle, 1991).”
- Robot juggling: implementation of memory-based learning (1994, methodology): “Common algorithms to choose the subset or the weighting are, for example, n-nearest neighbor methods (e.g., [12, 25]) or kernel regression (e.g., [ 19 , 28, 37]).”