Robot juggling: implementation of memory-based learning
By Stefan Schaal, Christopher G. Atkeson. 1994
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Sergey Levine
- J. Urgen Schmidhuber
- Pieter Abbeel
- Jan Peters
- Yoshua Bengio
- Peter Stone
- Chelsea Finn
- Trevor Darrell
Citations in the corpus
- Reinforcement learning in robotics: A survey (2013, background): “This approach has resulted in a variety of robot reinforcement learning applications that include pendulum swing-up tasks learned with DDP (Atkeson and Schaal, 1997; Atkeson, 1998), devil-sticking (a form of gyroscopic juggling) obtained with local LQR solutions (Schaal and Atkeson, 1994), trajector”
- Reinforcement Learning: A Survey (1996, background): “Schaal and Atkeson (1994) constructed a two-armed robot, shown in Figure 11, that learns to juggle a device known as a devil-stick.”
- Active Learning with Statistical Models (1996, neutral): “This contrasts with related work by Plutowski and White (1993), which is concerned with (cid:12)ltering an existing data set.”
- Intrinsically Motivated Learning of Real-World Sensorimotor Skills with Developmental Constraints (2013, methodology): “Here we propose a method, inspired by the SSA algorithm (Schaal and Atkeson, 1994), to guide the system to learn on the pathway toward the selected goal position x g .”
- Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction (1998, methodology): “Schaal and Atkeson (1994) applied locally weighted regression to a robot juggling control problem, where it was used to learn a system model.”
- Reward Functions for Accelerated Learning (1994, methodology): “Their control systems are collections of parallel, concurrently active behaviors, some of which gather sensory information, some drive effectors, and some monitor progress and contribute reinforcement.”
- Learning and Using Models (2012, methodology): “One of the earliest model-based RL methods used locally weighted regression (LWR) to learn models (Schaal and Atkeson, 1994; Atkeson et al, 1997).”
- Intrinsically motivated goal exploration for active motor learning in robots: A case study (2010, methodology): “In [6], Schaal & Atkeson propose a method called SSA to deal with learning sparse data in high dimensional spaces.”
- Fast, smooth and adaptive regression in metric spaces (2009, background): “[11] which considers the smooth control of a robotic tool based on noisy outside input).”
- Learning to search: Functional gradient techniques for imitation learning (2009, background): “Of note is the work of Schaal and Atkeson ( Schaal and Atkeson 1994; Atkeson et al. 1995) whose algorithms develop control strategies within a given environment using trajectory demonstrations.”
- Scalable Techniques from Nonparametric Statistics for Real Time Robot Learning (2002, background): “The robot uses its top two joints to perform planar devil-sticking; more details can be found in (Schaal and Atkeson, 1994).”
- From model-based control to data-driven control: Survey, classification and perspective (2013, methodology): “Schaal and Atkeson first applied lazy learning algorithms to control problems in 1994 [115].”
- Neural networks and differential dynamic programming for reinforcement learning problems (2016, unknown): “We consider some assumptions to simplify (A).”
- Machine Learning and Radiology (2012, background): “It has broad applications in robot control (Schaal and Atkeson, 1994) and game playing (Schraudolph et al., 1994).”
- A Framework for Reinforcement Learning on Real Robots (1998, background): “More recently, Schaal and Atkeson constructed a robot that successfully learned a form of juggling [ 7 ].”
- Locally Weighted Learning for Control (1997, methodology): “This is done by the shifting setpoint algorithm (SSA) (Schaal and Atkeson 1994a).”