The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS): normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample.

By John R. Crawford, Julie D. Henry. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2003

1,828 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/efa7bc8a7fdcd46aa4cb77bfd12f6e901a369b88

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Ruth A. Baer
2. E. Lykins
3. Richard M. Ryan
4. Nikos Ntoumanis
5. Adam M. Grant
6. Kimberley J. Bartholomew
7. P. Norton
8. Kirk Warren Brown

In General Health Professions

1. P. Norton
2. H. Orcutt
3. John R. Crawford
4. Nikos Ntoumanis
5. Sebastiano Costa
6. Kimberley J. Bartholomew
7. Nuran Bayram
8. Julie D. Henry

In Social Psychology

1. Nikos Ntoumanis
2. Kimberley J. Bartholomew
3. Sebastiano Costa
4. Richard M. Ryan
5. C. Thøgersen‐Ntoumani
6. J. Reeve
7. Adam M. Grant
8. Francesca Cuzzocrea

Citations in the corpus

• The prospective relationship of interpersonal forgiveness and psychological distress symptoms among college women (2006, background): “…the proposed factor structure of the DASS and DASS-21 and have also provided good evidence that the factor structure is comparable in both clinical and nonclinical samples (Antony et al., 1998; Brown et al., 1997; Clara, Cox, & Enns, 2001; Crawford & Henry, 2003; Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995b).”
• The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: a systematic review and meta-analysis of a multi-level system of parenting support. (2014, methodology): “For example, the two subscales of the ECBI have been shown to be highly correlated ( r = .75; Robinson, Eyberg, & Ross, 1980), and the three subscales of the DASS are highly intercorrelated ( r = .70 – .71; Crawford & Henry, 2003).”
• Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS) (2005, positive): “In a recent work, published after the completion of this paper, Crawford and Henry (2003) found that the best fitting model of the latent structure of the DASS consisted of three correlated factors (Depression, Anxiety and Stress) in which three items (9, 30 and 33) were permitted to load on more…”
• Percentile Norms and Accompanying Interval Estimates from an Australian General Adult Population Sample for Self‐Report Mood Scales (BAI, BDI, CRSD, CES‐D, DASS, DASS‐21, STAI‐X, STAI‐Y, SRDS, and SRAS) (2011, background): “…reliability, has a factor structure that is consistent with the allocation of the items to subscales, and exhibits high convergent validity with other measures of anxiety and depression in both clinical and community samples (Brown, Chorpita, Korotitsch, & Barlow, 1997; Crawford & Henry, 2003).”
• Autonomy support, relationship satisfaction and goal focus in the coach–coachee relationship: which best predicts coaching success? (2014, background): “…at the 60th percentile for the general population, stress was at the 70th percentile for the general population, whereas depression was only at the 18th percentile for the general population – none of these levels was high enough to be classified as of clinical concern (Crawford & Henry, 2003).”
• Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) (2018, methodology): “Using a representative community sample, aged 18–91 years, Crawford and Henry (2003) and in a community dwelling sample, Taylor, Lovibond, Nicholas, Cayley, and Wilson (2005) found a three-factor structure for the measure.”
• The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. (2004, methodology): “Normative data are now available for all three scales in a form that is equivalent to that presented here for the PANAS ( Crawford & Henry, 2003; Crawford, Henry, Crombie, & Taylor, 2001; Henry, Crawford, Bedford, Crombie, & Taylor, 2002); that is, they consist of percentile tables derived from lar”
• Pre-Service Teachers: Dispositional Traits, Emotional States, and Quality of Teacher-Student Interactions (2011, background): “Previous studies have shown the DASS to have excellent reliability as well as convergent and discriminant validity (Crawford & Henry, 2003).”
• Psychological need thwarting in the sport context: assessing the darker side of athletic experience. (2011, methodology): “Psychological Need Thwarting in the Sport Context 87 increasingly constrained models was analyzed via the S-B χ2 difference test (Satorra & Bentler, 2001) using the “sbdiff” software (Crawford, 2007; Crawford & Henry, 2003).”
• Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS-21): Psychometric analysis across four racial groups (2007, methodology): “Confirmatory factor analyses of the DASS-42 (Brown et al, 1997 ; Crawford & Henry, 2003 ; Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995b) indicated that a three-factor model corresponding to the scales, showed significantly better fit to the data than either a two- or one-factor model.”
• The link between emotional competence and well-being: a longitudinal study (2006, background): “Specifically, we focus on depression, anxiety, and stress, because of their relatively high prevalence in both normal and clinical groups (Crawford & Henry, 2003 ; Kessler et al , 2005 ) and their links to such important outcomes as reduced pursuit of personal goals (for depression and anxiety; H”