The somatic marker hypothesis: still many questions but no answers: Response to Bechara et al.

By Tiago V. Maia, James L. McClelland. 2005

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ef6ffdfa3ce4e6fcafd2eddbf1d71fb9d2b4f9b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

1. Andrew D. Lawrence
2. Tim Dalgleish
3. Ty W. Boyer
4. B. Dunn

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. W. Bruine de Bruin
2. Timo Mäntylä
3. F. Del Missier
4. Andrew D. Lawrence
5. Tim Dalgleish
6. Ty W. Boyer
7. B. Dunn
8. E. Sadler‐Smith

In Neurology

1. Ty W. Boyer

Citations in the corpus

• Decision-making Competence, Executive Functioning, and General Cognitive Abilities (2012, background): “However, this conception of the IGT has been debated (Maia & McClelland, 2004, 2005).”
• The somatic marker hypothesis: a critical evaluation. (2006, background): “An alternative explanation, however, is that apparently non-optimal rational decision-making behaviour in the face of partial explicit knowledge reflects exploratory behaviour by the participant to further garner information about the task at hand (Maia and McClelland, 2005).”
• The development of risk-taking: A multi-perspective review (2006, background): “Moreover, some challenge the assumption that unconscious somatic markers guide decisions in the IGT, and propose that more parsimonious cognitive processes may actually guide choice (Maia & McClelland, 2004, 2005).”