Rigid graph control architectures for autonomous formations

632 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Robust consensus tracking of a class of second-order multi-agent dynamic systems (2010, neutral): “, [13]–[15]), and flocking (e.”
Formation control using range-only measurements (2011, neutral): “Unless otherwise specified, we shall assume that the underlying graph of the formation is generically minimally rigid and the associated formation is minimally rigid (Anderson et al., 2008).”
Closing ranks in rigid multi‐agent formations using edge contraction (2010, background): “For various reasons, multi-agent systems, where each agent can be a vehicle, a robot, or a sensor unit, constitute a more effective sensor than a single vehicle in many cases [11].”
Bearing Rigidity and Almost Global Bearing-Only Formation Stabilization (2014, background): “MULTI-AGENT formation control has been studied extensively in recent years with distance-constrained formation control taking a prominent role [1]–[7].”
Distributed Formation Control of Multi-Agent Systems Using Complex Laplacian (2014, background): “The former mainly concentrates on defining a formation using graph-theoretic rigidity [4], [16], [17], [22], [33], [40], while the latter concerns stabilization to a formation [7], [8], [10], [24], [32], [38], [39] and control of formation shape in moving [3], [5], [12]–[14], [20].”