Quantifying the Contribution of Organisms to the Provision of Ecosystem Services

By Gary W. Luck, R. Harrington, P. Harrison, C. Kremen, P. Berry, R. Bugter, Terence P. Dawson, Francesco de Bello, Sandra Díaz, C. Feld and 12 more. 2009

397 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ef0ec19872915f05436df5f8eace53c5dba53218

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Plant functional effects on ecosystem services (2013, background): “Journal of Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society 2005; Luck et al. 2009), to understand mechanisms underpinning ecosystem potential to deliver these services, and to understand synergies and trade-offs between multiple services (Bennett, Peterson & Gordon 2009; Lavorel & Grigulis 2012).”
Ecosystem services (2011, positive): “The concept was originally proposed by Luck et al. (2003) and has more recently been refined and extended (see Luck et al., 2009).”
Handbook of protocols for standardized measurement of terrestrial invertebrate functional traits (2017, positive): “The prime utilization of plant functional traits is to identify abiotic and biotic mechanisms that determine species composition, ecosystem processes and service delivery (Lavorel & Garnier 2002; Diaz et al. 2007a; Luck et al. 2009; de Bello et al. 2010; Lavorel et al. 2013).”
Ecosystem service trade-offs from supply to social demand: A landscape-scale spatial analysis (2014, positive): “Because landscape units vary in the ecosystem ervices they provide, we tested whether they can be classified as ervice-providing units (SPUs), a concept that describes portions f the territory with the ability to provide multiple ecosystem serices (Luck et al., 2009).”
Conservation of species interaction networks (2010, background): “This utilitarian approach to conservation focuses on the composition and diversity of key ‘‘service-provider” species (Luck et al., 2009).”
Coral reef ecosystem services in the Anthropocene (2019, background): “If services are co‐produced between ecological and social systems, then the ecological units that underpin services, known as service providers, should be defined in relation to the needs, wants and aspirations of beneficiaries (Luck et al., 2009).”
Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Ecosystem Services in Europe: The Case of Pest Control by Vertebrates (2012, background): “A functional group contributing to a given service provision is referred to as service-providing unit (SPU; Luck et al. 2009).”
Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: a decision tree approach (2017, background): “Research related to ecosystem service assessment has grown considerably over the last two decades (Luck et al., 2009; Martín-López et al., 2014; Vihervaara et al., 2010).”
Plant root traits affecting the resistance of soils to concentrated flow erosion (2012, background): “In degraded areas in a context of ecosystem restoration, several authors have stressed the need to identify species and plant traits that contribute to the provision of ecosystem services (Díaz et al., 2006; Luck et al., 2009).”