Conservation of species interaction networks

By J. Tylianakis, Etienne Laliberté, Anders Nielsen, Jordi Bascompte. 2010

907 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6cecd961c6ff22328ed494f4bbefdb3981ddb8cf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Structure–stability relationships in networks combining mutualistic and antagonistic interactions (2014, background): “A network is nested when species connected with specialists belong to a proper subset of the species connected with generalists (Almeida-Neto et al. 2008, Joppa et al. 2009, Tylianakis et al. 2010).”
Macroecology of pollination networks (2013, background): “Besides number of species, biodiversity also encompasses the interactions among species (Hooper et al., 2005; Tylianakis et al., 2010), and ecological network analysis is a powerful way to analyse species and their interactions as an entity – an approach that has grown considerably in popularity…”
Microbial diversity and ecological networks as indicators of environmental quality (2017, background): “Certain authors even proposed that a modification in network structure could lead to an alteration in the functioning of ecosystems and to a reduction in their stability (resistance/resilience) in the long term (Tylianakis et al. 2010; Vacher et al. 2016).”
Beyond species loss: The extinction of ecological interactions in a changing world (2015, background): “define critical indicators providing early diagnosis of environmental problems (Tylianakis et al. 2010; Aizen, Sabatino & Tylianakis 2012; Dirzo et al. 2014).”
Protecting an ecosystem service: approaches to understanding and mitigating threats to wild insect pollinators (2016, background): “572 While plant-pollinator interactions are dynamic, the topology or structure of the network is 573 thought to confer a degree of stability or robustness upon the community (Bascompte et al., 574 2003; Kaiser-Bunbury et al., 2010; Memmott et al., 2004; Olesen et al., 2007; Ramos575 Jiliberto et al.”
Historical climate‐change influences modularity and nestedness of pollination networks (2013, background): “…community persistence (Th é bault and Fontaine 2010), for instance, by decreasing functional redundancy of species and thereby increasing the likelihood of secondary extinctions (Tylianakis et al. 2010), while nestedness increases the resilience of the network (Th é bault and Fontaine 2010).”