Plant functional effects on ecosystem services

By S. Lavorel. 2013

286 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/26de05f74d7c98dd1a6552cc8936f382ce283017

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. C. Violle
2. Brian J. Enquist
3. Van M. Savage
4. B. Blonder
5. Josep Peñuelas
6. Brian J. McGill
7. S. Bonser
8. J. Norberg

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Josep Peñuelas
2. C. Violle
3. Peter M. van Bodegom
4. I. Martínez
5. Brody Sandel
6. Colleen Webb
7. Jens‐Christian Svenning
8. P. Pinho

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. C. Violle
2. Brian J. Enquist
3. B. Blonder
4. Brian J. McGill
5. Colleen Webb
6. Van M. Savage
7. Brody Sandel
8. S. Bonser

Citations in the corpus

• Linking earth observation and taxonomic, structural and functional biodiversity: local to ecosystem perspectives (2016, background): “…content, plant/canopy height, or leaf phenology, traits can be successfully implemented for the satellite-based quantification and assessment of ecosystem services and ecosystem functions such as primary production, photosynthetic activities, gas exchange or climate regulation (Lavorel, 2013).”
• Handbook of protocols for standardized measurement of terrestrial invertebrate functional traits (2017, unknown): “Recent developments in trait-based ecology have been led by plant ecologists, as plant traits have become effective predictors of community assembly (G€otzenberger et al. 2012; HilleRisLambers et al. 2012) and ecosystem processes (Lavorel 2013), and are now widely used.”
• Spatial patterns and climate relationships of major plant traits in the New World differ between woody and herbaceous species (2018, background): “This will enable us to evaluate the relative importance of both in driving ecosystem processes, a long-standing goal of functional ecology (D ıaz et al., 2007; Enquist et al., 2015; Lavorel, 2013).”
• Understanding biodiversity-ecosystem service relationships in urban areas: A comprehensive literature review (2017, unknown): “…of trait-based approaches to identify biotic control over ecosystem service delivery within (de Bello et al. 2010; Díaz et al. 2007; Lavorel 2013) and across trophic levels (Lavorel 2013; Moretti et al. 2013), as well as synergies and trade-offs among ecosystem services (Lavorel & Grigulis 2012).”
• Towards a trait‐based ecology of wetland vegetation (2017, background): “Plant functional traits have emerged as a promising link from species to ecosystem processes that underpin ES generation (D ıaz et al. 2007; Lavorel 2013; Lamarque et al. 2014).”
• Lichen traits responding to aridity (2015, background): “2011) and brings a fresh new insight to this area of research from a less known group of organisms, a gap of knowledge that had been pointed out before (Lavorel 2013).”
• Using plant functional traits to restore Hawaiian rainforest (2015, background): “A body of evidence shows that plant traits vary continuously, in predictable ways, along resource availability gradients – suggesting that species’ functional traits can be linked to ecosystem properties and to ecosystem services (Lavorel 2013).”
• Scaling from Traits to Ecosystems: Developing a General Trait Driver Theory via Integrating Trait-Based and Metabolic Scaling Theories (2015, background): “This community-weighted variance or CWM is increasingly a standard metric in trait-based ecology (Garnier and Navas, 2012; Lavorel, 2013; Violle et al., 2007) and represents the trait mean calculated for all species in a community weighted by species abundances as follows: CWMj,y¼ Xnj k¼1 Ak, j (…”
• Mycorrhizal Fungi to Alleviate Drought Stress on Plant Growth (2014, background): “fungi translate into interactions between ecosystem services (Lavorel 2013).”