Children and Adolescents and Digital Media

By Yolanda Linda Reid Chassiakos, Jenny S. Radesky, D. Christakis, M. Moreno, Corinn Cross. Pediatrics, 2016

1,140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Today’s children and adolescents are immersed in both traditional and new forms of digital media. Research on traditional media, such as television, has identified health concerns and negative outcomes that correlate with the duration and content of viewing. Over the past decade, the use of digital media, including interactive and social media, has grown, and research evidence suggests that these newer media offer both benefits and risks to the health of children and teenagers. Evidence-based benefits identified from the use of digital and social media include early learning, exposure to new ideas and knowledge, increased opportunities for social contact and support, and new opportunities to access health promotion messages and information. Risks of such media include negative health effects on sleep, attention, and learning; a higher incidence of obesity and depression; exposure to inaccurate, inappropriate, or unsafe content and contacts; and compromised privacy and confidentiality. This technical report reviews the literature regarding these opportunities and risks, framed around clinical questions, for children from birth to adulthood. To promote health and wellness in children and adolescents, it is important to maintain adequate physical activity, healthy nutrition, good sleep hygiene, and a nurturing social environment. A healthy Family Media Use Plan (www.healthychildren.org/MediaUsePlan) that is individualized for a specific child, teenager, or family can identify an appropriate balance between screen time/online time and other activities, set boundaries for accessing content, guide displays of personal information, encourage age-appropriate critical thinking and digital literacy, and support open family communication and implementation of consistent rules about media use.

Subfields: Education, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee755b0588b4f6e5b1dbce6f77f6091937f4a7a7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

  1. David De Coninck
  2. Noor Bloemen
  3. Timothy Teo
  4. Ellen J. Helsper
  5. Kjartan Ólafsson
  6. B. Hu
  7. Xiaoquan Pan

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Kjartan Ólafsson
  2. David De Coninck
  3. Noor Bloemen
  4. Timothy Teo
  5. Ellen J. Helsper
  6. Xiaoquan Pan
  7. Ruth Festl
  8. Sonia Livingstone

Citations in the corpus