Perceptual adjustments to multiple speakers
By Tanya Kraljic, Arthur G. Samuel. 2007
311 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ee5559ea244c7a1ac81cd604037174e5476265b2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Sarah Brown-Schmidt
- Sophie K. Scott
- Ann Bradlow
- Sven L. Mattys
- Matthew H. Davis
- Tessa Bent
- Alison Trude
- Holger Hopp
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Matthew H. Davis
- Sarah Brown-Schmidt
- Sophie K. Scott
- Ann Bradlow
- Sven L. Mattys
- Tessa Bent
- Alison Trude
- Holger Hopp
In Language and Linguistics
- Sarah Brown-Schmidt
- Sophie K. Scott
- Ann Bradlow
- Sven L. Mattys
- Tessa Bent
- Alison Trude
- Holger Hopp
- Caitlin E. Coughlin
Citations in the corpus
- Contextualizing /s/ retraction: Sibilant variation and change in Washington D.C. African American Language (2021, background): “…2007; Zimman, 2017) and phonological conditioning (Baker, Archangeli, & Mielke, 2011; Stevens & Harrington, 2016), which likely underlies the general observation that =s= shows a large degree of interspeaker variation (e.g., Newman et al., 2001; Kraljic & Samuel, 2007; Stuart-Smith et al., 2020).”
- Talker-specific perceptual adaptation during online speech perception (2012, background): “While previous research had established the existence of talker-specific perceptual learning (Goldinger, 1998; Kraljic & Samuel, 2007; Magnuson & Nusbaum, 2007), little research had addressed whether this perceptual information could be accessed in time to guide on-line speech perception.”
- Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review (2012, background): “…that top-down mechanisms play a critical role in supporting perceptual learning when speech is degraded by vocoding (Dahan & Mead, 2010; Davis et al., 2005; Hervais-Adelman et al., 2008) or inclusion of ambiguous speech segments (Eisner & McQueen, 2005; Kraljic & Samuel, 2007; Norris et al., 2003).”
- Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. (2008, methodology): “…learning of speech has been quite widely demonstrated in the case of native-accented speech for native listeners (e.g. Eisner & McQueen, 2005, 2006; Kraljic & Samuel, 2005, 2006, 2007; Maye et al., 2003; Norris et al., 2003), and in other cases of speech by ''special'' talkers (for speech by…”
- Converging toward a common speech code: imitative and perceptuo-motor recalibration processes in speech production (2013, unknown): “…perception/recognition and changes in perceptual representations after exposure to only a few speech sounds (e.g., Nygaard and Pisoni, 1998; Bertelson et al., 2003; Norris et al., 2003; Clarke and Garrett, 2004; Kraljic and Samuel, 2005, 2006, 2007; McQueen et al., 2006; Bradlow and Bent, 2008).”
- Learning (not) to predict: Grammatical gender processing in second language acquisition (2016, background): “…mirror findings from speech perception, where listeners rapidly adapt their prediction according to speaker identity and implicitly learn to adjust their expectations from previous prediction errors (e.g. Kraljic and Samuel, 2007; Kleinschmidt and Jaeger, 2015; for syntax, see Kamide, 2012).”