Understanding software project risk: a cluster analysis

By Linda G. Wallace, Mark Keil, Arun Rai. Information Manager (The), 2004

449 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Does risk management contribute to IT project success? A meta-analysis of empirical evidence (2010, methodology): “Wallace and Keil (2004) and Wallace et al. (2004a,b) use product performance and process performance, but these terms also refer to time and budget (process performance), as well as requirements (product performance).”
Information needs for software development analytics (2012, background): “conducted a survey of 507 project managers [10].”
Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions (2014, background): “Additional approaches (e.g. Al-Ahmad et al. 2009; Barclay 2008; Dwivedi et al. 2013b; Kappelman et al. 2006; Schmidt et al. 2001; Wallace et al. 2004; Yeo 2002) have provided alternative perspectives on common causes of IS project failure, for example the concept of “ project escalation ” (Keil et…”