Thermal comfort or money saving? Exploring intentions to conserve energy among low-income households in the United States

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Demand-side solutions for climate mitigation: Bottom-up drivers of household energy behavior change in the Netherlands and Spain (2020, background): “The importance of spatial and geographical location is strongly acknowledged in the literature [19,21,31,35,60,81,92].”
Synthesizing building physics with social psychology: An interdisciplinary framework for context and occupant behavior in office buildings (2017, unknown): “The TPB developed by Ajzen [35] has been widely adopted by researchers in energy research and social sciences to analyze proenvironmental behaviors and target specific attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control shaping behavioral intention and behaviors [36-41].”
High energy burden and low-income energy affordability: conclusions from a literature review (2020, background): “These include thermal discomfort and respiratory problems such as asthma (Fabian et al 2014, Wells et al 2015, Chen et al 2017), and exposure to lead and indoor air pollution (Fabian et al 2012).”
Psychological and Demographic Factors Affecting Household Energy-Saving Intentions: A TPB-Based Study in Northwest China (2020, background): “This paper considers the subjective expectation in financial benefits as a factor contributing to household energy-saving attitude, while most of previous studies treat it as an independent factor [37,38].”