Poverty of the Stimulus Revisited

308 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Emergent linguistic structure in artificial neural networks trained by self-supervision (2020, background): “Indeed, this has been the dominant perspective in linguistics, where language models have long been seen as inadequate and having no scientific interest, even when their usefulness in practical engineering applications is grudgingly accepted (15, 16).”
Problems of projection (2013, background): “4 Berwick et al. (2011). Most of the work has to do with performance. There has of course never been any question about the role of statistical analysis and other cognitive processes in linguistic performance. See Chomsky (1957, 17) and Miller and Chomsky (1963). But that is plainly a very different”
Exposure and input in bilingual development (2017, background): “Poverty of the Stimulus arguments (Berwick et al., 2011; Piattelli-Palmarini & Berwick, 2012) are not equivalent to saying that the acquisition of particular languages does not depend on exposure to language. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000863 Published online by Cambridge University Press”