Comparative performance of PPPs and traditional procurement in Australia

By P. Raisbeck, C. Duffield, Ming Xu. 2007

241 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Law, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ed44bb344bdb61cd2496c01143b360a6deabadb3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Strategy and Management

1. R. Osei–Kyei
2. Albert P. C. Chan
3. Peter E. D. Love
4. Peter R. Davis
5. Junxiao Liu
6. Jim Smith
7. M. Regan

Citations in the corpus

• Life Cycle Critical Success Factors for Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects (2015, background): “A PPP possesses a long-term integration of multiple stakeholders and a volatile and dynamic development process (Grimsey and Lewis 2005; Chinyio and Gameson 2009; Raisbeck et al. 2010; Yong 2010).”
• Conceptual Framework for the Performance Measurement of Public-Private Partnerships (2015, background): “Thus, several studies attempted to incorporate time into the evaluations of PPPs (NAO 2003; Zietlow 2004; Raisbeck et al. 2010).”
• Review of studies on the Critical Success Factors for Public–Private Partnership (PPP) projects from 1990 to 2013 (2015, background): “Since the rebirth of the Build–Own–Operate–Transfer (BOOT) concept to Design Build Finance Operate (DBFO) in the year 2000 (English, 2006), there has been an impressive progress in the Australian PPP market hence it is currently considered as one of the matured PPP markets in the world (Raisbeck et ”