SCALE DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF BIOTIC RESISTANCE TO BIOLOGICAL INVASION

By J. E. Byers, E. Noonburg. 2003

231 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ed326a283889a560a95c9edab6020fd47a3a7ad1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

NULL MODELS OF EXOTIC INVASION AND SCALE‐DEPENDENT PATTERNS OF NATIVE AND EXOTIC SPECIES RICHNESS (2004, background): “…exclusion are structuring native–exotic richness patterns at small scales, and that at larger scales environmental variation and exogenous immigration factors are more important drivers of community structure (Levine 2000, Shea and Chesson 2002, Brown and Peet 2003, Byers and Noonburg 2003).”
INVASIBILITY AND SPECIES RICHNESS OF A COMMUNITY: A NEUTRAL MODEL AND A SURVEY OF PUBLISHED DATA (2004, background): “Scale dependence may also arise as the amount or number of available resources changes with increasing scale (Byers and Noonburg 2003).”
Opposite relationships between invasibility and native species richness at patch versus landscape scales (2005, background): “The differences between the large scale survey and small scale experimental results may be due to propagule pressure (Lonsdale 1999, Levine 2000) or other extrinsic factors that vary with native diversity (Shea and Chesson 2002, Byers and Noonburg 2003 ).”
Plant functional group identity and diversity determine biotic resistance to invasion by an exotic grass (2013, background): “Spatially covarying environmental factors such as resource availability or disturbance regime can affect both diversity and invasibility (Levine & D’Antonio 1999; Byers & Noonburg 2003; Davies et al. 2007a).”
Integrating the Study of Non-native Plant Invasions across Spatial Scales (2006, result): “This hypothesis has recently been supported by a study of competition models in which differences in resources (niche opportunities) between communities generates such a pattern of negative correlations at small scales and positive correlations at larger scales ( Byers and Noonburg 2003 ).”
WEAK VS. STRONG INVADERS OF NATURAL PLANT COMMUNITIES: ASSESSING INVASIBILITY AND IMPACT (2005, background): “…in fact operate in natural systems, if only at local scales (e.g., Stohlgren et al. 1999, Brown and Peet 2003), and recent studies have looked to spatial scale to explain conflicting relationships between diversity and invasibility (Brown and Peet 2003, Byers and Noonburg 2003, Cully et al. 2003).”
Structural diversity as a predictor of ecosystem function (2019, background): “Proxies of biotic resistance to invasion were measured as components of richness (Byers and Noonburg 2003): species richness and PSR of exotic plants in the forest community.”
Eight-year Record of Hemigrapsus sanguineus (Asian Shore Crab) Invasion in Western Long Island Sound Estuary (2007, background): “…estuaries generally have low native diversities (Day et al. 1989) and are subject to high rates of non-native introductions (Cohen and Carlton 1998, Ruiz et al. 1997), and because diversity may be inversely correlated with invasion susceptibility (Byers and Noonburg 2003, Stachowicz et al. 1999).”
Species diversity, invasion success, and ecosystem functioning: disentangling the influence of resource competition, facilitation, and extrinsic factors (2006, background): “Second, the major mechanism by which diversity is ex- pected to enhance invasion resistance is via more complete use of resources (e.g. Elton 1958, Case 1990, Byers & Noonburg 2003, Tilman 2004).”
A unifying framework for biological invasions: the state factor model (2008, background): “Some studies have shown a positive correlation between native species richness and invasibility, while others have demonstrated a negative trend (Byers and Noonburg 2003)—a paradox attributed to the spatial scale of the experiment (Fridley et al.”
SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY EXPLAINS THE SCALE DEPENDENCE OF THE NATIVE-EXOTIC DIVERSITY RELATIONSHIP (2005, methodology): “First, in a theoretical study, using a simulation approach, Byers and Noonburg (2003) showed that a competition-based model that exhibits a negative relationship at small scales can become positively correlated when the number of available resources across the community is changed.”
The role of environmental generalist species in ecosystem function (2005, background): “Our definition of the global carrying capacity is slightly different from other treatments, where Ki is more commonly calculated as the carrying capacity of speciesi if it existed in isolation (i.e., no competition) (e.g.,Doncaster et al., 2000; Byers and Noonburg, 2003).”
The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. (2007, background): “Byers and Noonburg (2003) presented a Lotka-Volterra competition model in which the number of unique resources available could increase with spatial scale.”
Habitat Differences in Marine Invasions of Central California (2005, background): “Interaction strength between species may be weaker or resources may be more available in such undersaturated communities: conditions that have been shown to make them more vulnerable to invasion (Byers and Noonburg 2003).”