SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY EXPLAINS THE SCALE DEPENDENCE OF THE NATIVE-EXOTIC DIVERSITY RELATIONSHIP

By K. Davies, P. Chesson, S. Harrison, B. Inouye, B. Melbourne, K. Rice. 2005

469 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5cdcf2ef4202783c8064144f9bee5ab0fa7b96eb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Understanding the Effects of Marine Biodiversity on Communities and Ecosystems (2007, background): “…native-exotic richness correlation, particularly at larger spatial scales, whereas smaller scale negative relationships are often (but certainly not always) found, reflective of the more limited heterogeneity at that scale (e.g., Davies et al. 2005, Fridley et al. 2007, Shea & Chesson 2002).”
Species diversity, invasion success, and ecosystem functioning: disentangling the influence of resource competition, facilitation, and extrinsic factors (2006, background): “Proofs received from author(s): March 3, 2006”
The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. (2007, background): “…of the covarying factors that control both native and exotic richness and how they are distributed at multiple spatial scales, while often logistically difficult, could allow fine-scale experimental results to be scaled up to whole landscapes (Shea and Chesson 2002, Davies et al. 2005).”
Impacts of alien plant invasions on species richness in Mediterranean-type ecosystems: a meta-analysis (2009, background): “It has often been acknowledged that the type and magnitude of impacts depend on the spatial and temporal scale (Sax et al., 2002; Davies et al., 2005).”
Niche partitioning at multiple scales facilitates coexistence among mosquito larvae (2008, background): “Stabilizing mechanisms may also lead to scale-dependent coexistence, whereby species that cannot coexist locally due to asymmetric competitive ability or predator avoidance can co-exist at larger temporal or spatial scales that are environmentally heterogeneous (Chesson 2000, Davies et al. 2005).”
Functional composition controls invasion success in a California serpentine grassland (2010, background): “environmental heterogeneity, soil fertility, disturbance history and propagule pressure) (Robinson & Dickerson 1984; D’Antonio & Mahall 1991; Burke & Grime 1996; Planty-Tabacchi et al. 1996; Levine 2000, 2001; Davies et al. 2005).”
Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. (2007, background): “…and site conditions should allow native species and NIPS with different functional traits, competitive abilities and resource optima to coexist at the regional metacommunity scale, resulting in high diversity of both (Grime, 1974; Davies et al., 2005; Smith & Shurin, 2006; Melbourne et al., 2007).”
Diversity declines in Microstegium vimineum (Japanese stiltgrass) patches (2009, background): “This suggests exotic and native species are responding to the same environmental drivers, such as soil nitrate, in the landscape (Stohlgren et al., 2003; Davies et al., 2005).”
Mechanisms of Plant Invasions of North American and European Grasslands (2011, background): “Site variation in resource availability also affects species richness and invasibility (Davies et al. 2005, Melbourne et al. 2007, Sandel & Corbin 2010), and resource-rich sites often have the potential to have greater heterogeneity.”
The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. (2009, background): “The processes that influence species diversity shift with spatial scale (e.g. Davies et al. 2005; Silvertown et al. 2006; Diez et al. 2008) and phylogenetic patterns of species assemblages are likely to reflect those shifts.”
Aquatic pollution increases the relative success of invasive species (2010, background): “There has been a relative lack of emphasis on abiotic determinants of invasibility (Menke and Holway 2006), despite the observation that such factors underlie many observed cases of biotic resistance (or lack thereof) to invasion (e.g., Byers 2002; Davies et al. 2005; Von Holle 2005).”
Integrating the Study of Non-native Plant Invasions across Spatial Scales (2006, background): “Thus, both average factors and the variance in those factors may play a role in determining observed covariance patterns between native and non-native diversity, with one or other aspect dominating under different circumstances (Davies et al. 2005).”