NULL MODELS OF EXOTIC INVASION AND SCALE‐DEPENDENT PATTERNS OF NATIVE AND EXOTIC SPECIES RICHNESS

By J. Fridley, Rebecca Brown, J. Bruno. 2004

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ef85e7ce60e1058e5c2ab0a6157a37553f767b6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Petr Pyšek
2. D. Richardson
3. J. Bruno
4. J. Emmett Duffy
5. JJ Stachowicz
6. I. Kühn
7. J. Fridley
8. Nicholas Gotelli

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Petr Pyšek
2. D. Richardson
3. Milan Chytrý
4. J. Bruno
5. I. Kühn
6. J. Emmett Duffy
7. P. Borges
8. D. Sax

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Petr Pyšek
2. D. Richardson
3. J. Bruno
4. Milan Chytrý
5. I. Kühn
6. J. Emmett Duffy
7. Thomas J. Stohlgren
8. D. Sax

Citations in the corpus

• The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. (2007, background): “…for many vegetation types it has been reported that the slope and correlation coefficient of the NERR increase with scale (Brown and Peet 2003, Fridley et al. 2004, Stohlgren et al. 2006b), although work on insular floras suggests that the NERR is scale invariant across a certain range of…”
• Non-native plant invasions of United States National Parks (2009, background): “Fridley et al. (2004) reported that larger parks have a greater area and therefore more species, whether native or non-native.”
• Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility (2006, background): “This discrepancy is mostly due to the spatial scale of observation (Fridley et al., 2004; Herben et al., 2004) and can be explained by covarying external factors (Shea and Chesson, 2002).”
• Native and alien floras in urban habitats: a comparison across 32 cities of central Europe (2012, result): “This pattern is consistent with simulation studies based on a null model of community invasibility, which showed that a positive relationship between numbers of native and alien species prevails in large areas, whereas the opposite relationship is associated with small plots that accommodate a few i”
• Invasibility and species richness of island endemic arthropods: a general model of endemic vs. exotic species (2006, background): “…neutral models show that it is not necessary to assume biotic interactions between exotic and native species to obtain relationships like these (Fridley et al., 2004), and that a strong and negative relationship is inevitable if the number of individuals in the community is fixed and…”
• Invasibility: the Local mechanism driving community assembly and species diversity (2005, background): “696 ECOGRAPHY 28:5 (2005) invasibility can be quantified as the probability of establishment per arriving propagule (Davis et al. 2000).”
• Understanding the Effects of Marine Biodiversity on Communities and Ecosystems (2007, background): “The positive result in surveys is most often explained as a consequence of spatial heterogeneity, which positively affects both native and exotic richness by increasing niche diversity, although alternative explanations exist (Davies et al. 2005; Fridley et al. 2004, 2007).”
• MoB (Measurement of Biodiversity): a method to separate the scale-dependent effects of species abundance distribution, density, and aggregation on diversity change (2018, background): “…often lacks a simple answer, because the magnitude (and sometimes even the direction) of change in richness is strongly influenced by spatial scale (Chalcraft et al. 2004, Fridley et al. 2004, Knight and Reich 2005, Palmer et al. 2008, Powell et al. 2013, Blowes et al. 2017, Chase et al. 2018).”
• A compendium of essential concepts and terminology in invasion ecology (2010, background): “This discrepancy, termed the ‘ invasion paradox ’ by Fridley et al. (2007) , is largely explained by the spatial scale of observation (Fridley et al. 2004 ; Herben et al. 2004 ) and by covarying external factors (Shea & Chesson 2002 ).”