Effects of Implanted Dummy Acoustic Transmitters on Juvenile Atlantic Salmon

By G. L. Lacroix, D. Knox, P. McCurdy. 2004

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ece781d1baa6bac613d78c3597f90818d83322da

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Villy Christensen
2. Carl J Walters
3. S. Cooke
4. M. Stokesbury
5. Derek Knox
6. G. Jackson
7. J. Nielsen
8. D. Welch

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Villy Christensen
2. S. Cooke
3. Carl J Walters
4. Christa M. Woodley
5. Richard S. Brown
6. J. Nielsen
7. M. Brad Eppard
8. M. Stokesbury

Citations in the corpus

• An Evaluation of the Maximum Tag Burden for Implantation of Acoustic Transmitters in Juvenile Chinook Salmon (2010, background): “…that acoustic transmitters and PIT tags had negative effects on the survival of juvenile Chinook salmon when tag burdens were 6.7% or more, which accords with the recommended maximum tag burdens for juvenile coho salmon (7%; Chittenden et al. 2009) and Atlantic salmon (8%; Lacroix et al. 2004).”
• Survival and behaviour of post-smolt Atlantic salmon in coastal habitat with extreme tides (2005, methodology): “…of theBritish Isles, Journal of FishBiology 2005, 66, 485–498 The smolts were surgically implanted with individually coded acoustic transmitters (8mm diameter V8 series, Vemco Ltd.) as described by Lacroix et al. (2004b), except that a clove oil solution (40 to 80mg l 1) was used as an anaesthetic.”
• Advancing the surgical implantation of electronic tags in fish: a gap analysis and research agenda based on a review of trends in intracoelomic tagging effects studies (2011, methodology): “There is a growing body of literature that some species of fish do not exhibit significant mortality, tag loss or sublethal impacts when tagged with devices that approach as much as 8‐12% of body mass (e.g., Brown et al. 1999; Lacroix et al. 2004 ).”
• Riverine and early ocean migration and mortality patterns of juvenile steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) from the Cheakamus River, British Columbia (2007, background): “3 g in air, or 5% of average body weight and 11% of average length (Lacroix et al., 2004).”
• Surgical implantation techniques for electronic tags in fish (2010, background): “Atlantic salmon 146 36 Non-absorbable monofilament 4–0 FS-2 cutting Lacroix et al. (2004)”
• Maximum tag to body size ratios for an endangered coho salmon (O. kisutch) stock based on physiology and performance (2008, methodology): “In their research on Atlantic salmon, Lacroix et al. (2004) compared the effects of three lengths of 8 mm diameter tags.”
• Freshwater and marine migration and survival of endangered Cultus Lake sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) smolts using POST, a large-scale acoustic telemetry array (2009, background): “Tag–body size ratios of nearly all fish were below recommended limits for juvenile salmonids of 16% of length and 8% of weight (Lacroix et al. 2004).”