The link between 'green' and economic success: environmental management as the crucial trigger between environmental and economic performance.

By Stefan Schaltegger, Terje Synnestvedt. Journal of Environmental Management, 2002

649 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eccb06e37446f43d88b000bdfc5c5cbd67796e04

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

ISO 14001 certification and financial performance: selection-effect versus treatment-effect (2011, background): “…2001; King and Lenox, 2002; King et al., 2005; NDEMS, 2003; Potoski and Prakash, 2005; Russo and Harrison, 2001; Szymanski and Tiwari, 2004; Schaltegger and Synnestvedt, 2002), there are few articles that examine the relationship between ISO 14001 and financial performance, and there is…”
Barriers to the adoption of green operational practices at Brazilian companies: effects on green and operational performance (2016, background): “The effects of GOPs on company performance indicators also need to be better understood because, up to now, most studies tend to analyse the effects of green management from an economic perspective (Schaltegger and Synnestvedt 2002; Wagner 2005; de Burgos‐Jiménez et al. 2013).”
Sustainability Practices and Corporate Financial Performance: A Study Based on the Top Global Corporations (2011, positive): “The major conclusion that can be drawn from Schaltegger and Synnestvedt (2002) theoretical framework is that, relationship between environmental performance and economic success can vary at given level of economic success.”
Corporate sustainability: an integrative definition and framework to evaluate corporate practice and guide academic research (2014, background): “In a related argument, Schaltegger and Synnestvedt (2002) maintain that as organizations develop environmentally friendly technologies the marginal costs of environmental protection can, over time, actually be reduced.”
The Environmental, Social, Governance, and Financial Performance Effects on Companies that Adopt the United Nations Global Compact (2015, background): “An environmentally friendly company that is not economically friendly will sooner or later disappear from the market, along with its environmentally beneficial activities [34].”
Proactive CSR: An Empirical Analysis of the Role of its Economic, Social and Environmental Dimensions on the Association between Capabilities and Performance (2013, background): “…environmental dimensions of proactive CSR and financial performance may follow an inverted U-shaped pattern, meaning that such practices may improve financial performance at first, but sooner or later engagement will represent net costs (Burke and Logsdon, 1996; Schaltegger and Synnestvedt, 2002).”
The concept of environmental performance and its measurement in empirical studies (2011, positive): “7 their influencing factors are still not identified sufficiently (Schaltegger and Synnestvedt 2002; Marom 2006; Lankoski 2008).”
Do corporate sustainability practices enhance organizational economic performance (2015, background): “However, some authors advocate inversely U-shaped curve, especially when discussing the link between environmental performance and economic performance (Schaltegger and Synnestvedt, 2002), suggesting that there is an optimal level of environmental performance.”