Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers
By Ronald Brelger, Kathleen M. Carley, P. Pattison. 2004
473 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ec1ca56fd70a6e42b89b7ed96ce1cb570878a1da
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- M. A. Porter
- Marc Barthelemy
- Alex Arenas
- Mikko Kivelä
- Steve W. J. Kozlowski
- Carter T. Butts
- Garry Robins
- Santo Fortunato
Citations in the corpus
- Multilayer networks (2013, methodology): “Similarly, one can use meta-matrices to conduct a dynamic network analysis [52] that incorporates temporal and spatial information, node attributes and types, and other types of data about social networks in the same framework.”
- The Dynamics of Emergence: Cognition and Cohesion in Work Teams (2012, methodology): “For example, one could model the emergence of transactive memory using dynamical network analysis (Breiger et al., 2003).”
- A Graph-theoretic perspective on centrality (2006, background): “Such a measure, called fragmentation (F), was introduced by Borgatti (2003, forthcoming).”
- Dynamics of Networks if Everyone Strives for Structural Holes1 (2008, background): “, Weesie and Flap (1990), Doreian and Stokman (1997), Stokman and Doreian (2001), Dutta and Jackson (2003), Breiger et al. (2003), and Jackson (2003)”
- A tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks. Part I (2017, background): “The recent years have witnessed an important tendency towards filling the gap between SNA and dynamical systems, giving rise to new theories of Dynamical Social Networks Analysis (DSNA) [25] and temporal or evolutionary networks [26, 27].”
- New Specifications for Exponential Random Graph Models (2006, methodology): “These were discussed by Snijders (2002), Handcock (2002a, 2002b, 2003), and Robins, Pattison, and Woolcock (2005), and they go back to a type of model degeneracy discussed in a more general sense by Strauss (1986).”
- Inference in Curved Exponential Family Models for Networks (2006, methodology): “The development of these methods for social network data was considered by Dahmström and Dahmström (1993); Corander, Dahmström, and Dahmström (1998); Crouch, Wasserman, and Trachtberg (1998); Snijders (2002); and Handcock (2002).”
- Modeling Dependencies in International Relations Networks (2004, methodology): “The use of inner products to model dependencies is new and related to the recent development of ‘‘latent space’’ models for dyadic data (Hoff et al. 2002; Hoff 2003b; Ward et al. 2003).”
- Find me if you can: improving geographical prediction with social and spatial proximity (2010, methodology): “Most of the literature has focused on using geography to explain and model relationships [4], and in this paper we would like to propose the reverse: given a set of relationships and some knowledge of geography, how well can we predict the location of others in the network? The remainder of this pap”