Modeling Dependencies in International Relations Networks
By Peter D. Hoff, Michael D. Ward. Political Analysis, 2004
181 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80ec05e5e90fdd2dc728276bb3a39cf531fb8afd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Bruce A. Desmarais
- Skyler J. Cranmer
- Elizabeth J. Menninga
- David Muchlinski
- David S. Siroky
- J. Park
- Kevin M. Quinn
- Andrew D. Martin
Citations in the corpus
- Complex Dependencies in the Alliance Network (2012, background): “…should not be taken to deny the utility of alternative approaches, but rather reflects a desire to move away from independence assumptions completely and to directly model network effects which will be of substantive interest to international relations scholars in most empirical applications.”
- Inferential Network Analysis with Exponential Random Graph Models (2011, methodology): “Some promising approaches have also been developed out of spatial statistical methods (Franzese and Hays 2006; Hoff, Raftery and Handcock 2002; Hoff and Ward 2004).”
- Comparing Random Forest with Logistic Regression for Predicting Class-Imbalanced Civil War Onset Data (2016, background): “2009), and is gaining increasing use in political science (Hoff and Ward 2004; Ward and Hoff 2007; Ward et al. 2007, 2010; Hill and Jones 2014).”
- An Empirical Evaluation of Explanations for State Repression (2014, background): “See, e.g., Hathaway (2007); Linzer and Staton (2011); Rı́os-Figueroa and Staton (2014).”
- MCMCpack: Markov chain Monte Carlo in R (2011, background): “The interest in Bayesian methods in the social sciences is growing, and a number of researchers are using these approaches in substantive applications dealing with: deliberative bodies (Clinton, Jackman, and Rivers 2004; Martin and Quinn 2002), economic performance (Western 1998), income dynamics (G”