Usage-based models of language

By M. Barlow, S. Kemmer. 2000

706 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eafd4c2b8f092e2ef1f24a99e45a3ceabc89d733

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

FREQUENCY OF INPUT AND L2 COLLOCATIONAL PROCESSING (2013, background): “In usage-based models, novelty is explained through the presumed existence of so-called schemata (Langacker, 1987 , 1988 , 2000 ).”
Avoiding dative overgeneralisation errors: semantics, statistics or both? (2014, result): “Although this assumption is shared with many previous proposals (e.g., Bowerman, 1981; Braine & Brooks, 1995; Kay & Fillmore, 1999; Langacker, 2000), the present account goes further in assuming (like the account of Pinker, 1989) that all argument-structure overgeneralisation errors can be…”
Codeswitching and language change: One thing leads to another? (2005, background): “10 Closely related terms are usualization, routinization, and habitualization (see Györi, 2002, p.151; Langacker, 2000, p.3; Thomason, 2001, pp.135 – 136).”
Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives (2015, background): “Usage-based theory takes the view that the cognitive representation of language emerges through, and is shaped by, language use (Langacker, 1987, 2000; Hopper, 1987; Barlow & Kemmer, 2000; Bybee, 2006, 2010, 2013; Bybee & Hopper, 2001; Bybee & McClelland, 2005).”
Radical Construction Grammar (2001, methodology): “In the usage-based model (Bybee 1985, 2010, this volume; Langacker 1988; Barlow and Kemmer 2000; Croft 2000), speakers store tokens of language use as exemplars.”
The nature of generalization in language (2009, background): “…constructionist approaches are generally usage-based: facts about the actual use of linguistic expressions such as frequencies and indi- vidual patterns that are fully compositional are recorded alongside more traditional linguistic generalizations (Barlow and Kemmer 2000; Langacker 1988).”
Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics - Introduction to the special issue (2006, background): “So Cognitive Linguistic (Barlow and Kemmer 2000; Croft and Cruise 2004; Langacker 1987; Robinson and Ellis in press; Taylor 2002; Ungerer and Schmid 1996), Construction Grammar (Goldberg 1995), and Probabilistic and Frequency-based (Bod, Hay et al. 2003; Bybee and Hopper 2001; Ellis 2002a, 2002b; Ju”
Converging evidence: Bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions (2005, methodology): “One step towards testing insights arising from the linguist’s intuition and introspection is to relate them to an analysis of naturalistic usage data as provided by corpora (cf., e.g., papers in Barlow and Kemmer 2000; Boas 2003; Diessel 2004; Goldberg et al. 2004).”