Consciousness and the varieties of emotion experience: a theoretical framework.

By J. Lambie, A. Marcel. Psychology Review, 2002

619 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Data reviewed suggest that previous theories of emotion experience are too narrow in scope and that lack of consensus is due to the fact that emotion experience takes various forms and is heterogenous. The authors treat separately the content of emotion experience, the underlying nonconscious correspondences, and processes producing emotion experience. They classify the nature and content of emotion experience and propose that it depends on 3 aspects of attention: mode (analytic-synthetic; detached-immersed), direction (self-world), and focus (evaluation-action). The account is informed by a 2-level view of consciousness in which phenomenology (1st order) is distinguished from awareness (2nd order). These distinctions enable the authors to differentiate and account for cases of "unconscious" emotion, in which there is an apparent lack of phenomenology or awareness.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e9e1f2185f352051cba334b7a919edcee703bb66

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Lisa Feldman Barrett
  2. Kristen A. Lindquist
  3. Kevin N. Ochsner
  4. Tor D. Wager
  5. Hedy Kober
  6. James J. Gross
  7. Agnes Moors
  8. Klaus R. Scherer

In Social Psychology

  1. Kristen A. Lindquist
  2. Lisa Feldman Barrett
  3. Agnes Moors
  4. Kevin N. Ochsner
  5. Klaus R. Scherer
  6. Tor D. Wager
  7. Hedy Kober
  8. Kirk Warren Brown

Citations in the corpus