Emotional information processing in repressors: The vigilance–avoidance theory

By N. Derakshan, M. Eysenck, L. Myers. 2007

189 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/99f135bc1b84e5e595c837a5da70f7888a3b0adf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Sander L. Koole
2. N. Amir
3. Adar Ben-Eliyahu
4. James J. Gross
5. Jutta Joormann
6. P. Sheeran
7. Thomas Llewelyn Webb
8. Catherine D’Avanzato

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Sander L. Koole
2. N. Amir
3. Adar Ben-Eliyahu
4. James J. Gross
5. Jutta Joormann
6. P. Sheeran
7. Thomas Llewelyn Webb
8. Catherine D’Avanzato

In Social Psychology

1. Sander L. Koole
2. N. Amir

Citations in the corpus

• The psychology of emotion regulation: An integrative review (2009, background): “A sophisticated model of repressive coping is vigilance-avoidance theory, which proposes that repressors respond to threatening stimuli in two stages (Derakshan et al., 2007).”
• Preliminary Study of Attention Training to Threat and Neutral Faces on Anxious Reactivity to a Social Stressor in Social Anxiety (2010, background): “Methodological differences among experiments do not permit for direct comparison and it is not clear to what extent individual differences (e.g., defensiveness; Derakshan et al. 2007 ) may affect generalizability and stability of attentional bias related to training.”