Firm behaviour and innovative performance: An empirical exploration of the selection–adaptation debate

By Marius T. H. Meeus, Leon A. G. Oerlemans. 2000

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e9e08e125d981c3578e8ae62352bbc040ded1e84

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Kemal Kilic
2. Gürhan Günday
3. Lütfihak Alpkan
4. Gündüz Ulusoy
5. Teofil Ciobanu
6. Carlos Martín-Ríos

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Kemal Kilic
2. Gürhan Günday
3. R. P. J. Rajapathirana
4. Lütfihak Alpkan
5. Yan Hui
6. Gündüz Ulusoy

In Strategy and Management

1. Kemal Kilic
2. Gürhan Günday
3. R. P. J. Rajapathirana
4. Lütfihak Alpkan
5. Yan Hui
6. Gündüz Ulusoy
7. Teofil Ciobanu
8. Carlos Martín-Ríos

Citations in the corpus

• Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance (2017, background): “…performance, due to this reasons company top management need to put attention regarding improving innovation capability because it is the most effective factor for innovation success (Meeus & Oerlemans, 2000) and introduce innovation in each type (product, process, organizational and marketing).”
• Organizational Support for Intrapreneurship and its Interaction with Human Capital To Enhance Innovative Performance (2010, methodology): “As for the construct of innovative performance, we employed a scale consisting of items adapted from the earlier studies of Antoncic and Hisrich (2001), Neely and Hii (1998), Meeus and Oerlemans (2000) and Hagedoorn and Cloodt (2003).”