Emotion, Development, and Self-Organization: Dynamic Systems Approaches to Emotional Development.

By A. Abbass. 2004

267 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e97bcee550e589c56959ccde3a51f2c39c20235d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Inquiry on Emotions in Education (2002, methodology): “…in relation to our goals (Carver & Scheier, 2000; Frijda, 1993; Lazarus 1991; Linnenbrink & Pintrich, 2002; Middleton & Midgely, 1997; Roeser, Eccles, & Strobel, 1998; Scherer, 1993, 2000; Schutz & Davis, 2000; Smith, 1991; Turner, Husman, & Schallert, 2002; Wolters, Yu, & Pintrich, 1996).”
The Dynamic Systems Approach as Metatheory for Developmental Psychology (2007, unknown): “…include cognitive, language, social, emotional and psychopathological development [Camras & Witherington, 2005; Fogel, Nwokah, Dedo, Messinger, Dickson, Matusov, & Holt, 1992; Granic, 2005; Lewis & Granic, 2000; Lewis, 2000a; Martin, Fabes, Hanish, & Hollenstein, 2005; Smith, 2005; van Geert,1998].”
The family ecology of adolescence: A dynamic systems perspective on normative development. (2008, background): “Several developmentalists have begun applying these principles to ontogenesis (e.g., Fogel, 1993; Fogel & Thelen, 1987; Keating, 1990a; Lewis, 1995; Lewis & Granic, 2000; Thelen & Smith, 1994; Thelen & Ulrich, 1991).”
Social dynamics in the preschool (2005, background): “…world: cycles of predator–prey populations (Murray, 1989), synchronization of basic brain-stem functions yielding higher-order cortical processes (Freeman, 2000; Lewis, 2005), coordination of limbs during walking (Thelen & Ulrich, 1991), and Xocking behavior of migrating birds (Couzin & Krause,…”
Theories of emotion causation: A review (2009, background): “The associative mechanism that figures in Barrett’s theory and in modern versions of network theory (e.g., Lewis, 2005) and appraisal theory (e.g., Scherer, 2000) is modelled after the complex associative mechanism proposed in connectionist or dynamic systems models.”
It’s About Time: A Special Section on Affect Dynamics (2015, background): “During the past decades, several prominent theorists have called for a paradigm shift in the study of emotions that moves the spotlight from the study of emotions as static entities to emotions as dynamic phenomena (Larsen, Augustine, & Prizmic, 2009; Lewis, 2005; Scherer, 2000).”
From affect programs to dynamical discrete emotions (2009, methodology): “Like the latter, dynamical affective science makes use of the conceptual and modelling tools of dynamical systems theory for the purposes of description and prediction (see Fogel et al., 1992; Lewis, 2005; Scherer, 1984; see also the papers in Lewis & Granic, 2000).”
A systems approach to appraisal mechanisms in emotion (2005, unknown): “Scherer (2000) has suggested that such catastrophe theory modeling can be proﬁtably employed to model emotion responses as based on appraisal processes.”
Emotions are emergent processes: they require a dynamic computational architecture (2009, background): “As suggested earlier (Scherer 2000), we may need to adopt nonlinear dynamic systems approaches for modelling complex, context-bound nonlinear functions , rather than our classic statistics and modelling tool boxes, which are largely based on linear functions.”
Sentic patterns: Dependency-based rules for concept-level sentiment analysis (2014, background): “More generally, Klaus Scherer has argued that emotion is a process characterized by non-linear relations among its component elements - especially physiological measures, which typically look Gaussian [29].”
A Coherent Metatheory for Dynamic Systems: Relational Organicism-Contextualism (2007, background): “While the mechanistic formulation has moved somewhat to the background – being explicitly identified as taking a ‘mechanistic approach’ is not fashionable these days – Witherington points out that among current research programs that carry the ‘dynamic systems’ label some [e.g., Thelen & Smith, 1994”
Self–other contingencies: Enacting social perception (2009, background): “She suggests that interactions and their development (and the development of the participants) are interdependent and that real-time interactions between people can form a system that is not reducible to its constituent parts (Granic 2000).”
Achievement Goals and Achievement Emotions: Testing a Model of Their Joint Relations with Academic Performance. (2009, background): “Emotions are defined in contemporary emotion research as multiple component processes that comprise specific affective, cognitive, physiological, and behavioral elements (Scherer, 2000; e.g., for anxiety: nervous feelings, worries, increased activation, anxious facial expression).”
RETHINKING THE EMOTIONAL BRAIN (2012, unknown): “…2003;; Ekman and Davidson, 1994; LeDoux, 1996; Panksepp, 1998, 2000, 2005; Rolls, 1999, 2005; Damasio, 1994, 1999; Leventhal and Scherer, 1987; Scherer, 2000; Ortony and Turner, 1990; Öhman, 1986, 2009; Johnson-Laird and Oatley, 1989; Ellsworth, 1994; Zajonc, 1980; Lazarus, 1981, 1991a,…”
Emotions and Crime over the Life Course: A Neo‐Meadian Perspective on Criminal Continuity and Change1 (2007, background): “…the early lead of scholars such as Dewey (1895), researchers have also increasingly positioned themselves against the view of cognitions and emotions as oppositional forces, instead forging a variety of interconnections (see, e.g., Freeman 2000; Lively and Heise 2004; Schwarz 2000; Seeburger 1992).”