Segregating semantic and syntactic aspects of processing in the human brain: an fMRI investigation of different word types.
By Angela D. Friederici, B. Opitz, D. V. Cramon. Cerebral Cortex, 2000
343 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e9782442f8c53b0663e39f3fb9be9000eac11393
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Angela D. Friederici
- Mathieu Vigneau
- Stefan Koelsch
- S. Kousta
- Jeffrey R. Binder
- Gabriella Vigliocco
- Laurie A. Stowe
- Virginie Beaucousin
Citations in the corpus
- Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing (2006, result): “Note that these results are in line with those obtained by Friederici who found a semantic role for an area close to the present F3opd cluster (À46 21 25) where a specific increase of activation during a semantic judgment task was observed (Friederici et al., 2000).”
- Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. (2002, methodology): “Friederici et al. (2000) used “Jabberwocky” sentences in comparison to normal sentences, word strings containing only content words, and nonwords.”
- The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. (2011, methodology): “On the singleword processing level, a shift from BA 44 to BA 45 was demonstrated when words had to be judged for their syntactic word category (BA 44) or for their concreteness (BA 45), respectively (79).”
- Adults and children processing music: An fMRI study (2005, background): “…reported to be involved in the processing of lexical-semantic aspects, i.e., meaning, of language (Baumgaertner et al., 2002; Démonet et al., 1992; Friederici, 2002; Friederici et al., 2000; Halgren et al., 2002; Helenius et al., 1998; Kuperberg et al., 2000; Ni et al., 2000; Price et al., 1997).”
- Rethinking the neurological basis of language (2005, methodology): “The single storage function hypothesis, on the other hand, predicts that as phrasal storage demands increase during sentence processing, the amount of resources available for a nonsentential verbal memory task should decrease.”
- The representation of abstract words: why emotion matters. (2011, background): “…a number of studies have failed to find any regions at all that are activated more during concrete word processing (Grossman et al., 2000; Friederici et al., 2000; Kiehl et al., 1999; Krause et al., 1999; Noppeney and Price, 2004; Perani et al., 1999; Pexman et al., 2007; Tyler et al.,…”
- Distinct Brain Systems for Processing Concrete and Abstract Concepts (2005, background): “In the others, analysis was confined to brain regions activated by all words, a procedure that eliminates from consideration areas with a strong dependence on concreteness (Grossman et al., 2002; Friederici et al., 2000).”