Outcome of a Treatment Program for Adult Sex Offenders

By Robert J. McGrath, Georgia F. Cumming, J. Livingston, Stephen E. Hoke. 2003

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Is treatment non-completion associated with increased reconviction over no treatment? (2007, unknown): “…45/225 (1b) 27/225 (2a) 42/220 (2b) 33/220 (a) 41/190 (b) 30/190 (a) 5/14 (b) 4/14 (a) /0.04 (a/1a) /0.39* (a/2a) /0.42 (b/1b) /0.50 (b/2b) /0.37 McGrath et al. (2003) Prison-based CBT with community aftercare for male sex offenders Untreated refusers Mean 14.5 months of treatment compared…”
DOES A WATCHED POT BOIL? A Time-Series Analysis of New York State's Sex Offender Registration and Notification Law (2008, background): “Moreover, resources would be better spent on evidence-based sex offender management strategies that have been shown to reduce sexual offending, such as cognitive-behavioral treatment programs for offenders (Lösel & Schmucker, 2005; McGrath et al., 2003).”
Actuarial Assessment of Risk for Reoffense Among Adult Sex Offenders (2007, methodology): “Despite these data, the MnSOST-R is regularly used in 13 states for the purposes of sexually violent predator assessments (Doren, 2004) and in 20% and 24% of community and residential sex offender programs, respectively, in the United States (McGrath et al., 2003).”