Actuarial Assessment of Risk for Reoffense Among Adult Sex Offenders

By Calvin M. Langton, H. Barbaree, Michael C. Seto, E. Peacock, L. Harkins, Kevin T. Hansen. 2007

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Jiaming Zeng
2. Berk Ustun
3. Cynthia Rudin
4. R. K. Hanson
5. D. Thornton

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jiaming Zeng
2. Berk Ustun
3. Cynthia Rudin
4. D. Thornton

Citations in the corpus

• Interpretable classification models for recidivism prediction (2015, background): “…for domestic violence (see, e.g., the Spousal Abuse Risk Assessment of Kropp and Hart 2000), sexual violence (see, e.g., Hanson and Thornton 2003, Langton et al. 2007), and general violence (see, e.g., Historical Clinical and Risk Management tool of Webster et al. 1997, or the Structured…”
• The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. (2009, background): “Study 1 Allam (1999) 54 Langton (2003) 2 A. Allan & Dawson (2002) 54.1 Langton et al. (2007) 3 A. Allan et al. (2006) 55 [London Probation] Craissati et al. (2005) 4 [Arizona] Fischer (2000) 55.1 [London Probation] Webb et al. (2007) 4.1 [Arizona] Bartosh et al. (2003) 56 Marghem (2007) 5(a, b)…”