DOES A WATCHED POT BOIL? A Time-Series Analysis of New York State's Sex Offender Registration and Notification Law

264 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Assessing the Impact of Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification On Sex-Offending Trajectories (2010, result): “These results are in line with those reported by previous studies (Adkins et al., 2000; Duwe & Donnay, 2008; Freeman, 2009; Letourneau & Armstrong, 2008; Sandler et al., 2008; Schram & Milloy, 1995; Vasquez et al.; Zevitz, 2006; Zgoba et al., 2008).”
Desistance and Attitudes Towards Sex Offenders: Facilitation or Hindrance? (2010, background): “Given that enactment of community protection legislation is emotionally driven rather than empirically informed, it is not surprising that there is little evidence supporting its assumed effectiveness (Duwe et al. 2008; Letourneau et al. (in press); Levenson et al. 2007b; Sandler et al. 2008; Vasq”
Effects of South Carolina’s Sex Offender Registration and Notification Policy on Adult Recidivism (2010, background): “…thereof) between SORN and recidivism; thus, as with one other study that distinguished between subtypes of offenders (e.g., rapists and child molesters; Sandler et al., 2008), we found no evidence that South Carolina’s SORN policy differentially influenced recidivism rates of offender subtypes.”