Validation of the multicultural personality questionnaire in the context of personnel selection

By K. van der Zee, J. Zaal, Jantien Piekstra. 2003

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Communication, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e91fcb52dcb6c116da68252184cf3a039d7f6220

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Jean–Marc Dewaele
2. H. C. Hwang
3. Dawn A. Matsumoto

In Communication

1. H. C. Hwang
2. Jean–Marc Dewaele
3. Dawn A. Matsumoto
4. C. Harris
5. A. Panayiotou

In Social Psychology

1. H. C. Hwang
2. Taghreed M. Al-Saraj
3. Jean–Marc Dewaele
4. Dawn A. Matsumoto
5. Chengchen Li
6. P. Macintyre

Citations in the corpus

• Assessing Cross-Cultural Competence (2013, methodology): “…the incremental ecological validity of the MPQ to predict successful adjustment outcomes above and beyond other personality measures (van der Zee et al., 2003; van der Zee & van Oudenhoven, 2000), self-efficacy (van Oudenhoven & van der Zee, 2002), demographics (van Oudenhoven et al.,…”
• Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety of Arab learners of English: The effect of personality, linguistic and sociobiographical variables (2015, background): “Cultural Empathy is most strongly related to the Big Five dimension of Agreeableness (van der Zee et al., 2003, p. 79); Openmindedness is related to Openness-to-experience (p. 79); Emotional Stability and Social Initiative are strongly correlated with Neuroticism and Extraversion (p. 80).”