What Works in Prisoner Reentry? Reviewing and Questioning the Evidence.

254 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Description of the Self-Identified Needs, Service Expenditures, and Social Outcomes of Participants of a Prisoner-Reentry Program (2011, background): “Although the variety in reentry programs makes comparison difficult (Petersilia, 2004), Seiter and Kadela (2003) reviewed 32 published studies to identify effective reentry services and programs.”
Reentry and the (Unmet) Needs of Women (2010, background): “These areas are: (a) childcare and parenting skills development; (b) healthcare, mental health counseling, and substance abuse treatment; (c) housing and transportation services; (d) education, employment, and job training services; and (e) and social support programs (Petersilia, 2004).”
Intensive supervision programs: Does program philosophy and the principles of effective intervention matter?☆ (2010, background): “Referred to as the Canadians’ theory of rehabilitation (see Cullen, 2002; Lowenkamp, Latessa, & Smith, 2006; Petersilia, 2004), the principles of effective intervention identify appropriate correctional programs as those that: (1) provide human service rather than sanctions, (2) adhere to the risk…”