Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing

404 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The neuroscience of learning: beyond the Hebbian synapse. (2013, background): “…and direction (Antle & Silver 2005, Bouton & Garcia-Gutierrez 2006, Budzynski & Bingman 1999, Buhusi & Meck 2005, Crystal 2001, Denniston et al. 2004, Gwinner 1996, Matzel et al. 1988, Meck 2003, Savastano & Miller 1998, Zhang et al. 2006), but there is not space to review that literature here.”
Tempo and Rhythm (2010, methodology): “Formal models developed within this framework typically posit distinct clock, memory, and decision stages of temporal processing (Gibbon et al. 1984; Meck 2003).”
Numerical competence in animals, with an insight from ants (2011, background): “Summarising modern concepts of number representation in animals and humans (Brannon & Roitman , 2003; Reznikova, 2007a; Beran, 2009; Cantlon et al., 2009; Evans et al., 2009; Premack, 2010), we suggest a distinction between quantitative judgement (quantitative but not necessarily numerical) and…”
Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions (2010, neutral): “Many authors—usually those who are interested in human motor timing, animal learning, or human cognition—have argued that there is no need to refer to a clock for describing timing behaviors (Block, 1990; Hopson, 2003; Zeiler, 1998, 1999).”