Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions

By Simon L. Grondin. Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2010

978 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Temporal Experience and the Temporal Structure of Experience (2014, background): “Furthermore, on theories of duration perception on which duration is measured by a counter, accumulator, or other clock-like neural process (see Grondin (2010) for a review of different models), there is no reason why, if the neural clock gives a faulty readout one moment, it need “compensate” by…”
The Neural Basis of Timing: Distributed Mechanisms for Diverse Functions (2018, background): “Standard examples of timing tasks include (Grondin, 2010): Interval/duration discrimination. discriminating which of two presented durations (or intervals) is the longest, or making a judgment as to whether an event is short or long relative to a standard (e.g., bisection task).”
Beyond Self-Report: Tools to Compare Estimated and Real-World Smartphone Use (2015, background): “but much of the cognitive literature on time-perception suggests we are poor at estimating such durations [12].”
Spontaneous α Brain Dynamics Track the Episodic “When” (2023, background): “First, retrospective timing is most relevant and ecologically valid over longer time scales (seconds to minutes and hours) but this time scale prevents collecting many trials within a single experiment (Grondin, 2010; Chaumon et al., 2022; Balc ı et al., 2023).”