De novo identification of repeat families in large genomes
By Alkes L Price, Neil Christopher Jones, Pavel A. Pevzner. Intelligent Systems in Molecular Biology, 2005
2,042 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8dba5bf84c7c3cdae3648a76d0af6ff1e393009
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Aviv Regev
- Oleksiy Kohany
- Deborah F. Smith
- Daniel P. Depledge
- K. Kojima
- Ryan P. J. Lower
- Weidong Bao
In Genetics
- R. Saxena
- K. Saxena
- H. D. Upadhyaya
- Danso Ako-Adjei
- Stephen Fitzgerald
- Todd A. Castoe
- Aviv Regev
- Javier Herrero
In Molecular Biology
- Aviv Regev
- Kim D. Pruitt
- Donna R. Maglott
- Arian F. A. Smit
- Robert M. Hubley
- Tatiana A. Tatusova
- Cédric Feschotte
- Bernard Henrissat
Citations in the corpus
- Genome of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus provides insight into the oldest plant symbiosis (2013, methodology): “It has been hypothesized that AMF maintain an assemblage of genetically different nuclei (heterokaryosis) and transmit them from generation to generation (12, 13).”
- Trinity: reconstructing a full-length transcriptome without a genome from RNA-Seq data (2011, positive): “Seed selection by Inchworm was largely inspired by similar methods implemented in the RepeatScout algorith”
- The Paleozoic Origin of Enzymatic Lignin Decomposition Reconstructed from 31 Fungal Genomes (2012, methodology): “Genomic assembly scaffolds of each genomes were masked using RepeatScout (9) and RepeatMasker (10) and the RepBase (11) library of fungal repeats.”
- RepSeq – A database of amino acid repeats present in lower eukaryotic pathogens (2007, positive): “While a large number of applications have been developed for detecting and analysing genome-level repeats (e.g. Repeat Masker [16], Repeat Scout [17] and Tandem Repeats Finder [18]), there are very few applications/databases which deal with proteome-level repeats.”
- Repbase Update, a database of repetitive elements in eukaryotic genomes (2015, methodology): “There are a number of tools designed to automate TE identification and/or annotation, such as RECON [14], RepeatScout [15], PILER [16], RepeatModeler [17], Dfam [18], REPCLASS [19], REPET [20], and PASTEC [21], with none having distinct advantages [20, 22].”
- Comparative Genomics of Plant-Associated Pseudomonas spp.: Insights into Diversity and Inheritance of Traits Involved in Multitrophic Interactions (2012, methodology): “REP elements were defined by searching for repeat sequences greater than 30 nt in length that occurred more than 10 times within individual genomes using RepeatScout [154].”
- Benchmarking transposable element annotation methods for creation of a streamlined, comprehensive pipeline (2019, methodology): “Comparison of General Repeat Annotators We benchmarked five general repeat annotators, including RECON [43], RepeatScout [26], RepeatModeler [28], Red [27], and Generic Repeat Finder (GRF) (https://github.com/bioinfolabmu/GenericRepeatFinder), as well as a repeat database Repbase [30], which is wide”