Interactions between bivalve shellfish farms and fishery resources

By M. Gibbs. 2004

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e8ba0cb125402c341afdbbd3d4c5840c4f38e9af

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Growth performance and condition of oysters (Crassostrea gigas and Ostrea edulis) farmed in an offshore environment (North Sea, Germany) (2011, background): “Shellfish aquaculture, particularly oyster andmussel cultivation, is a good example for extensive production and has become very attractive (Gibbs, 2004).”
Integrated assessment of ecosystem-scale carrying capacity in shellfish growing areas (2008, background): “Additionally, aquaculture is a subject of controversy in many countries, often involving local watermen, conservation agencies and non-governmental organisations (Crawford, 2003; Gibbs, 2004), and these conflicting viewpoints give rise to licensing concerns in many nations.”
Review of recent carrying capacity models for bivalve culture and recommendations for research and management (2006, background): “Such effects are rarely discussed (but see Davenport et al., 2003; Gibbs, in press) and within those publications which address this issue there is a bias toward “negative” effects, largely ignoring potentially “positive” ones (see, for example, Gibbs, 2004 ).”
Analysis of coastal and offshore aquaculture: Application of the FARM model to multiple systems and shellfish species (2009, background): “When compared to monoculture of finfish or shrimp, shellfish aquaculture has become very attractive (Gibbs, 2004) since it does not require artificial food input (Garen et al.”
The ecological role of bivalve shellfish aquaculture in the estuarine environment: A review with application to oyster and clam culture in West Coast (USA) estuaries (2009, background): “Researchers in New Zealand established a framework for the expected effect of suspended culture on fish which includes three mechanisms: attraction to structure, direct influence on recruitment, and indirect food web effects (Gibbs, 2004).”
An integrated ecosystem approach for assessing the potential role of cultivated bivalve shells as part of the carbon trading system (2015, background): “Remineralization of nutrients in pseudofaeces and faeces in the water column and mostly in the benthos (Grant et al. 1995, CH O O CO H O2 2 2 2+ → + ↔ + ++Ca 2HCO CaCO CO H O2 3– 3 2 2 + ↔ ↔ + ↔ ++ +CO H O H CO H HCO 2H CO2 2 2 3 3– 32– 282 Filgueira et al.: Bivalve shells and CO2 cycle Newell…”
Predicting the carrying capacity of bivalve shellfish culture using a steady, linear food web model (2005, background): “…of culture that could be introduced until significant changes to energy fluxes occurred (defined here as the ecological carrying capacity), and to the point where the culture replaces the ecological role of zooplankton (the theoretical production carrying capacity—see Gibbs, 2004 for details).”
Management of productivity environmental effects and profitability of shellfish aquaculture - the Farm Aquaculture Resource Management (FARM) model (2007, background): “Naylor et al., 2000) and potential enhancements both of primary production and biodiversity ( Gibbs, 2004; McKindsey et al., 2006).”
Depletion of plankton in a raft culture of Mytilus galloprovincialis in Ría de Vigo, NW Spain. I. Phytoplankton (2008, background): “Mussel cultivation has increased dramatically since the middle of last century (Smaal 2002) and has gained increasing international importance (Gibbs 2004).”
Influence of suspended and off-bottom mussel culture on the sea bottom and benthic habitats: a review. (2011, background): “…meroplankton may be consumed by mussels and that Lehane and Davenport (2002) have shown that mussels in suspension consume a greater quantity of meroplankton than those on the bottom, mussel culture may thus reduce the number of individuals able to recruit to the natural environment (Gibbs 2004).”