Influence of suspended and off-bottom mussel culture on the sea bottom and benthic habitats: a review.
By C. McKindsey, Philippe Archambault, Myriam D. Callier, F. Olivier. 2011
198 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c0a57c4d5119952c51b90a285b049b373bdf4b6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- G. Reid
- S. Robinson
- P. Cranford
- Myriam D. Callier
- Rochelle D. Seitz
- C. McKindsey
- D. Gallardi
- T. Ysebaert
In Oceanography
- P. Cranford
- Rochelle D. Seitz
- S. Robinson
- G. Reid
- Myriam D. Callier
- C. McKindsey
- T. Ysebaert
- D. Gallardi
Citations in the corpus
- Impacts of marine and freshwater aquaculture on wildlife: a global meta-analysis (2018, unknown): “Shellfish and algae farming do not require inputs of feed, but high densities of filter feeding shellfish in farms do accumulate biomass, attracting wild fish and invertebrate species (Dealteris et al. 2004; Powers et al. 2007; McKindsey et al. 2011; Segvic-Bubic et al. 2011), while algae farming at”
- Effects of Bivalve Aquaculture on the Environment and Their Possible Mitigation: A Review (2014, background): “On balance, whether or not bivalve culture has a negative or positive effect depends on the values that are used to weight the different components [4].”
- An integrated ecosystem approach for assessing the potential role of cultivated bivalve shells as part of the carbon trading system (2015, background): “…effect on habitat is related to the deployment of 3-dimensional physical structures in the ocean, which can provide refuge from predators and/or provide food sources for different species (McKindsey et al. 2011), ultimately altering species assemblages (Gibbs 2004), which can impact CO2 fluxes.”
- Attraction and repulsion of mobile wild organisms to finfish and shellfish aquaculture: a review (2018, background): “Shellfish aquaculture introduces considerable hard physical structure into an environment (bottom and water column) where such structure may largely be absent (Moroney & Walker 1999, Carman et al. 2010, McKindsey et al. 2011).”
- Identifying the consequences of ocean sprawl for sedimentary habitats (2017, background): “…where flow is reduced, such as on the landward sides of breakwaters (Zanuttigh et al., 2005) and artificial reefs (Fricke et al., 1986), and in areaswhere flow is impeded by structures for aquaculture (Guiral et al., 1996; McKindsey et al., 2011) and recreational boating (Rivero et al., 2013).”
- Habitat value of bivalve shellfish and seaweed aquaculture for fish and invertebrates: Pathways, synthesis and next steps (2021, background): “45,47 These organisms have been found to provide important food sub-sidies for artificial reef-associated fish species 48 and are well established as key contributors to bivalve reef communities that can enhance fish and mobile invertebrate production.”
- Open water integrated multi-trophic aquaculture: constraints on the effectiveness of mussels as an organic extractive component (2013, background): “The organic enrichment effects of organic biodeposition by commercial mussel culture operations have been reviewed on several occasions and tend to be either negligible or localized (e.g. Burkholder & Shumway 2011, McKindsey et al. 2011).”
- Ecological value of coastal habitats for commercially and ecologically important species (2014, background): “C ollege of W illiam and M ary user on 30 O ctober 2018 et al., 2009; Forrest et al., 2009; Ysebaert et al., 2009; McKindsey et al., 2011; Shumway, 2011; Cranford et al., 2012).”