Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception

395 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency (2008, methodology): “Open-bigram coding schemes (Grainger & van Heuven, 2003; Whitney, 2001) code letter strings by activating a series of bigram nodes that reflect the order of the letters (e.g., for the word JUDGE, the nodes for JU, JD, JG, UD, UG, etc. would all be activated, but not the node for DJ because the J…”
Watching the Word Go by: On the Time-course of Component Processes in Visual Word Recognition (2009, methodology): “Support from NICHD grant HD25889 and HD043251 to Phillip J. Holcomb, and ANR grant 06-BLAN-0337 to Jonathan Grainger.”
A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing (2011, methodology): “All of the alternative schemes, including the one proposed by Grainger and van Heuven (2003) to be described below, involved an increased flexibility in the way letter identities are tied to within-word position.”
On the Time Course of Visual Word Recognition: An Event-related Potential Investigation using Masked Repetition Priming (2006, background): “Grainger and van Heuven (2003) proposed an extended framework for orthographic processing based on the interactive activation model.,This lack of sensitivity would appear to suggest that the use of ERPs in the masked priming paradigm will not likely tell us much about the sequence of early preseman”