Co-management: concepts and methodological implications.

By L. Carlsson, Fikret Berkes. Journal of Environmental Management, 2005

1,331 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e82a0cda29cebc481f70015dae63bafbc5ce82f7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Ö. Bodin
2. Carl Folke
3. Fikret Berkes
4. R. Plummer
5. D. Armitage
6. B. Crona
7. P. Olsson
8. L. Gunderson

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Ö. Bodin
2. R. Plummer
3. D. Armitage
4. B. Crona
5. P. Olsson
6. Olga Yudina
7. Maria Tengö
8. Fikret Berkes

Citations in the corpus

• The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? (2009, background): “, 2007; Schusler and Decker, 2003), (ii) mobilizationandallocationofkeyresources foreffectivegovernance (e.g. Carlsson and Sandström, 2008; Carlsson and Berkes, 2005; NewmanandDale, 2007), (iii) commitment to commonrules among actors fosteringwillingness toengage inmonitoringand sanctioning programs”
• WHAT you know is WHO you know? Communication patterns among resource users as a prerequisite for co-management (2006, background): “The existences of such bridging ties are, in addition, thought to be important for the community’s potential for collective action (Granovetter 1973) and conflict resolution (e.g., Carlsson and Berkes 2005).”
• A landscape perspective on conservation of semi-natural grasslands (2008, background): “Such an arrangement may also help a problem-solving process where management power is shared across organizational levels (Carlsson and Berkes, 2005).”
• Environmental Governance for the Anthropocene? Social-Ecological Systems, Resilience, and Collaborative Learning (2017, background): “Adaptive management ideas have been applied to resource and environmental co-management, the idea of sharing management power and responsibility between the government and local resource users [48,55].”
• Sustainable Human Development and the Capability Approach: Integrating Environment, Responsibility and Collective Agency (2013, background): “However, power-sharing is the result of an extensive deliberation and negotiation process, and is neither the starting point nor a fixed state (Carlsson and Berkes, 2005).”
• Charting the New Territory of Adaptive Co-management: A Delphi Study (2007, background): “…appear to coincide with complex systems thinking, and it has therefore received increasing attention as a potential means to pursue learning by doing, as articulated in the adaptive management literature (Olsson et al. 2004, Carlsson and Berkes 2005, Folke et al. 2005, Armitage et al., in press).”
• Achieving social-ecological fit through bottom-up collaborative governance: an empirical investigation (2015, background): “…but also the involvement of actors across multiple scales (local, regional, supraregional) and across distinct geographic yet ecologically connected areas (Young 2002, Carlsson and Berkes 2005, Folke et al. 2005, Brondizio et al. 2009, Walker et al. 2009, Ostrom 2010a, Österblom and Bodin 2012).”
• Management of Natural Resources at the Community Level: Exploring the Role of Social Capital and Leadership in a Rural Fishing Community (2008, background): “…concepts such as co-man- 1 cite this article in press as: Bodin, Ö., & Cron orld Development (2008), doi:10.1016/j.worldd agement (see overview in Carlsson & Berkes, 2005) and adaptive co-management (Gadgil, Rao, Utkarsh, Pramod, & Chhatre, 2000; Olsson, 2003), often put forth as instrumental…”
• Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. (2009, background): “Instead of focusing on the formal structure of co-management and its power sharing arrangements, one can regard power sharing as the result, rather than the starting point of co-management (Carlsson and Berkes, 2005).”
• A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems (2006, background): “…learning characteristic of adaptive management (Holling 1978) and co-management, or the sharing of management power across organizational levels (Carlsson and Berkes 2005), with the linkage characteristics of cooperative management (e.g., Pinkerton 1989, Jentoft 2000) and collaborative…”
• Adaptive Comanagement: a Systematic Review and Analysis (2012, background): “Adaptive comanagment (ACM) has been put forward as one such promising approach (Carlsson and Berkes 2005).”